Cited by 29Nursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Change in Social Engagement among Incident Caregivers and Controls: Findings from the Caregiving Transitions Study

Open access
Liu, Chelsea, Fabius, Chanee D., Howard, Virginia J., Haley, William E., Roth, David L.·2021·Journal of Aging and Health

Abstract

Objectives:We aimed to compare incident family caregivers and matched controls on change in social network variables and satisfaction with social activities. Methods: A total of 479 participants from the Caregiving Transitions Study were included in the analysis, 244 (50.9%) of whom began substantial and sustained caregiving between baseline and follow-up interviews. We assessed associations between incident caregiving and change in social network size, change in monthly social contact, and satisfaction with social activities. Results: Incident caregivers reported lower satisfaction with social activities and greater decline in social network size than controls. Among only the caregivers, dementia caregivers reported greater decline in social network size while caregivers who were spouses, experienced higher strain, and provided more hours of care reported lower satisfaction with social activities. Discussion: Social engagement declined more among incident caregivers than controls. Future studies should aim to understand why subgroups of caregivers reported lower social engagement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0898264320961946

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with non-dementia caregivers, dementia caregivers report a greater decrease in their social networks.

    “Compared with non-dementia caregivers, dementia caregivers indicate a greater decrease in their social networks.495”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [495]

    The Abstract’s Results state that dementia caregivers reported a greater decline in social network size. But the Results and Discussion report the opposite after covariate adjustment: dementia caregivers had less decline than nondementia caregivers. The citing sentence omits this consequential qualification. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Compared with non-dementia caregivers, dementia caregivers indicate a greater decrease in their social networks.

    “Compared with non‐dementia caregivers, dementia caregivers indicate a greater decrease in their social networks (e.g., other relatives, friends, acquaintances). 539”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [539]

    The Abstract’s Results state that dementia caregivers reported a greater decline in social network size. However, the Results and Discussion report the opposite after covariate adjustment: dementia caregivers had less decline than nondementia caregivers. The unqualified claim omits this important distinction. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, C., Fabius, C. D., Howard, V. J., Haley, W. E., & Roth, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Chelsea
Venue
Journal of Aging and Health
Published
2020-09-23
Volume
33
Issue
1-2
Pages
114-124
ISSN
  • 0898-2643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6887
OpenAlex
W3088275190
Cited by
29
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Aging and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01 NS041588)
  • National Institute on Aging (RF1 AG050609)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
family caregivers, social engagement, social networks, social network size, social contact, dementia caregiving, caregiver burden, caregiver hours
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Social Isolation, Social Support, United States, Urban Population, Case-Control Studies, Caregivers, Spouses, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review