The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Performance in Social Enterprises
Open accessAbstract
This article addresses the subject of management control and tries to create a performance measurement system for social enterprises, that is, how to measure success. Three reference fields for management are analyzed: (a) economic-financial performance, linked to the determination of general performance (profits, value added, etc.) and analytic results (production-cost of services, efficiency indicators, etc.); (b) social effectiveness, to measure the quantity and quality of work undertaken and to identify its impact on the intended beneficiaries and the community; and (c) institutional legitimacy, verifying conformity with law and mission statement. In integrating these aspects, we propose a multidimensional controlling framework that is appropriate to the management of a social enterprise. We try to demonstrate the validity of the theoretical model through the illustration of an Italian empirical case: the work integration social enterprise “Ulisse.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The legitimacy of social enterprise
Dart, R. (2004) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.43 · Cited by 1,092
The Emergence of Social Enterprise
(2001) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203164679 · Cited by 1,079
Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations
Kaplan, R. S. (2001) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.11308 · Cited by 947
Accounting in its social context: Towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom
Burchell, S., Clubb, C., & Hopwood, A. G. (1985) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9 · Cited by 808
Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and Learning from the Differences
Kerlin, J. A. (2006) · Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2 · Cited by 788
The Governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective
Cornforth, C. (2004) · Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x · Cited by 534
Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: what (if anything) have we learnt?
Gray, R. (2001) · Business Ethics: A European Review · doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00207 · Cited by 484
Pearce, J., & Kay, A. (2003) · Cited by 352
Managing the non-profit organization: practices and principles
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4585 · Cited by 331
Multiple Constituencies and the Social Construction of Nonprofit Organization Effectiveness
Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1997) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764097262006 · Cited by 313
Cited by
Accountability in the Social Economy: The Case of Private Social Solidarity Institutions
Ferreira, A., Santos, C., Inácio, H., Costa, A. J., Bandeira, A. M., Tomé, B., Joaquim, C., Góis, C., Curi, D., Meira, D., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14031147 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C.
- Venue
- Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-165
- ISSN
- 0094-0607 (ISSN-L)
- 0899-7640
- 1552-7395
- OpenAlex
- W2097978072
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 13.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Performance in Social Enterprises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0899764009351111
- The paper
- Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C. (2011). Measuring Performance in Social Enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009351111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.