Cited by 130Urban and Rural Development ChallengesChild Nutrition and Water AccessWater Governance and Infrastructure

Health, hygiene and appropriate sanitation: experiences and perceptions of the urban poor

Open access
Joshi, Deepa, Fawcett, Ben, Mannan, Fouzia·2011·Environment and Urbanization

Abstract

“Don’t teach us what is sanitation and hygiene.” This quote from Maqbul, a middle-aged male resident in Modher Bosti, a slum in Dhaka city, summed up the frustration of many people living in urban poverty to ongoing sanitation and hygiene programmes. In the light of their experiences, such programmes provide “inappropriate sanitation”, or demand personal investments in situations of highly insecure tenure, and/or teach “hygiene practices” that relate neither to local beliefs nor to the ground realities of a complex urban poverty. A three-year ethnographic study in Chittagong, Dhaka, Nairobi and Hyderabad illustrated that excreta disposal systems, packaged and delivered as low-cost “safe sanitation”, do not match the sanitation needs of a very diverse group of urban men, women and children. It is of little surprise that the delivered systems are neither appropriate nor used, and are not sustained beyond the life of the projects. This mismatch, far more than an assumed lack of user demand for sanitation, contributes to the elusiveness of the goal of sanitation and health for all. The analysis indicates that unless and until the technical, financial and ethical discrepancies relating to sanitation for the urban poor are resolved, there is little reason to celebrate the recent global declaration on the human right to water and sanitation and health for all.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956247811398602

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joshi, D., Fawcett, B., & Mannan, F.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Dhaka (BD)
Venue
Environment and Urbanization
Published
2011-04
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
91-111
ISSN
  • 0956-2478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-0301
OpenAlex
W2130643498
Cited by
130
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
37.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Environment and Urbanization (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
AGE-WELL
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
Keywords
sanitation, hygiene, urban poverty, slums, excreta disposal, sanitation programs, user perception, tenure insecurity, local beliefs, right to water and sanitation, health for all, Chittagong, Dhaka, Nairobi, Hyderabad

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review