CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 249Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationEmotions and Moral BehaviorDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cuing Consumerism: Situational Materialism Undermines Personal and Social Well-Being

Bauer, Monika A., Wilkie, James E. B., Kim, Jung K., Bodenhausen, Galen V.·2012·Psychological Science
DOI 10.1177/0956797611429579
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Correlational evidence indicates that materialistic individuals experience relatively low levels of well-being. Across four experiments, we found that situational cuing can also trigger materialistic mind-sets, with similarly negative personal and social consequences. Merely viewing desirable consumer goods resulted in increases in materialistic concerns and led to heightened negative affect and reduced social involvement (Experiment 1). Framing a computer task as a “Consumer Reaction Study” led to a stronger automatic bias toward values reflecting self-enhancement, compared with framing the same task as a “Citizen Reaction Study” (Experiment 2). Consumer cues also increased competitiveness (Experiment 3) and selfishness in a water-conservation dilemma (Experiment 4). Thus, the costs of materialism are not localized only in particularly materialistic people, but can also be found in individuals who happen to be exposed to environmental cues that activate consumerism—cues that are commonplace in contemporary society.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797611429579

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 249

Related

Metadata

Authors
Bauer, M. A., Wilkie, J. E. B., Kim, J. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2012-03-16
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
517-523
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
DOI
10.1177/0956797611429579
OpenAlex
W2125302733
Cited by
249
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
36.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Association for Psychological Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
materialism, consumerism, situational cues, well-being, negative affect, social engagement, self-enhancement, task framing, competitiveness, selfishness, consumer goods
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Personal Satisfaction, Young Adult, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review