Cited by 138Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyCognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common DNA Markers Can Account for More Than Half of the Genetic Influence on Cognitive Abilities

Open access
Plomin, Robert, Haworth, Claire M. A., Meaburn, Emma L., Price, Thomas S., Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2, Davis, Oliver S. P.·2013·Psychological Science

Abstract

For nearly a century, twin and adoption studies have yielded substantial estimates of heritability for cognitive abilities, although it has proved difficult for genomewide-association studies to identify the genetic variants that account for this heritability (i.e., the missing-heritability problem). However, a new approach, genomewide complex-trait analysis (GCTA), forgoes the identification of individual variants to estimate the total heritability captured by common DNA markers on genotyping arrays. In the same sample of 3,154 pairs of 12-year-old twins, we directly compared twin-study heritability estimates for cognitive abilities (language, verbal, nonverbal, and general) with GCTA estimates captured by 1.7 million DNA markers. We found that DNA markers tagged by the array accounted for .66 of the estimated heritability, reaffirming that cognitive abilities are heritable. Larger sample sizes alone will be sufficient to identify many of the genetic variants that influence cognitive abilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797612457952

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

6 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100353 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Kovas Y., 2007, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72, 1, 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00439.x · DOI
  3. Plomin R., 2013, Behavioral genetics
  4. 10.1038/ng.686 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–125 of 125

Metadata

Authors
Plomin, R., Haworth, C. M. A., Meaburn, E. L., Price, T. S., Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2, & Davis, O. S. P.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Plomin, Robert
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2013-03-15
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
562-568
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2098272018
Cited by
138
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 19
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (085475/Z/08/Z, WT088984, 085475/B/08/Z)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD044454, R01HD046167, HD046167, R01HD044454)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
cognitive ability, heritability, missing heritability, twin studies, language skills, verbal ability, nonverbal ability, genetic variants, genotyping arrays
MeSH terms
Child, Cognition, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Humans, Intelligence, Phenotype, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review