Cited by 55Stress Responses and CortisolMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Treating Generational Stress: Effect of Paternal Stress on Development of Memory and Extinction in Offspring Is Reversed by Probiotic Treatment

Open access
Callaghan, Bridget L., Cowan, Caitlin S. M., Richardson, Rick·2016·Psychological Science

Abstract

Early-life adversity is a potent risk factor for mental-health disorders in exposed individuals, and effects of adversity are exhibited across generations. Such adversities are also associated with poor gastrointestinal outcomes. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that microbiota-gut-brain interactions may mediate the effects of early-life stress on psychological dysfunction. In the present study, we administered an early-life stressor (i.e., maternal separation) to infant male rats, and we investigated the effects of this stressor on conditioned aversive reactions in the rats' subsequent infant male offspring. We demonstrated, for the first time, longer-lasting aversive associations and greater relapse after extinction in the offspring (F1 generation) of rats exposed to maternal separation (F0 generation), compared with the offspring of rats not exposed to maternal separation. These generational effects were reversed by probiotic supplementation, which was effective as both an active treatment when administered to infant F1 rats and as a prophylactic when administered to F0 fathers before conception (i.e., in fathers' infancy). These findings have high clinical relevance in the identification of early-emerging putative risk phenotypes across generations and of potential therapies to ameliorate such generational effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797616653103

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Administration of a probiotic formulation containing L. rhamnosus R0011 and L. helveticus R0052 prevents the effects of early-life stress on fear behavior and its supporting neural network during development.

    “Finally, administration of a probiotic formulation containing L. rhamnosus R0011 and L. helveticus R0052 has been shown to prevent the effects of early-life stress on fear behavior and its supporting neural network during development (Callaghan et al., 2016;Cowan et al., 2016).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Callaghan et al., 2016

    The Probiotic Treatment section identifies the formulation as L. rhamnosus R0011 and L. helveticus R0052. The results section reports that treatment prevented or reversed stress-associated changes in fear-memory retention and extinction in infant rats. The paper does not show that treatment prevented effects on the supporting neural network; the Discussion treats effects on neural circuits as a possible mechanism, not a measured result. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early probiotic interventions mitigate the effects of antibiotic-treated and C-section delivered infants, early-life stress, maternal high-fat diet, and maternal immune activation on infant outcomes.

    “Several groups have now shown that early probiotic interventions mitigate the effects of antibiotic-treated and C-section delivered infants, early-life stress, maternal high-fat diet, and maternal immune activation on infant outcomes (see Table 5) (Buffington et al., 2016;Callaghan et al., 2016;Cowan et al., 2016;Fukui et al., 2018;Gareau et al., 2007;Hsiao et al., 2013;Korpela et al., 2018).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Callaghan et al., 2016

  • The high-fear phenotype is passed down the male line for at least two generations.

    “a profile that is passed down the male line for at least two generations (i.e., the grand-offspring of the stressed males exhibit the same high-fear phenotype despite never directly experiencing stress) (Callaghan et al., 2016).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Callaghan et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Barrett, E., Ross, R. P., O'Toole, P. W., Fitzgerald, G. F., & Stanton, C. (2012). γ- Aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113, 411-417.
  2. Campbell, B. A., & Spear, N. E. (1972). Ontogeny of memory. Psychological Review, 79, 215-236.
  3. Chitkara, D. K., van Tilburg, M. A. L., Blois-Martin, N., & Whitehead, W. E. (2008). Early life risk factors that contribute to irritable bowel syndrome in adults: A systematic review. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 103, 765-774.
  4. Cowan, C. S. M., Callaghan, B. L., & Richardson, R. (in press). The effects of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. helveticus) on developmental trajectories of emotional learning in stressed infant rats. Translational Psychiatry.
  5. Foster, L. M., Tompkins, T. A., & Dahl, W. J. (2011). A comprehensive post-market review of studies on a probiotic product containing Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011. Beneficial Microbes, 2, 319-334.
  6. Goyal, M. S., Venkatesh, S., Milbrandt, J., Gordon, J. I., Raichle, M. E. (2015). Feeding the brain and nurturing the mind: Linking nutrition and the gut microbiota to brain development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112, 14105-14112.
  7. Moriceau, S., Wilson, D. A., Levine, S., & Sullivan, R. M. (2006). Dual circuitry for odor-shock conditioning during infancy: Corticosterone switches between fear and attraction via amygdala. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6737-6748.
  8. Parashar, A., & Udayabanu, M. (2016). Gut microbiota regulates key modulators of social behavior. European Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 26, 78-91.
  9. Widom, C. S., Czaja, S. J., Bentley, T., & Johnson, M. S. (2012). A prospective investigation of physical health outcomes in abused and neglected children: New findings from a 30-year follow-up. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 1135-1144.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Callaghan, B. L., Cowan, C. S. M., & Richardson, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Callaghan, Bridget L.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2016-07-19
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
1171-1180
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2469737398
Cited by
55
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of New South Wales
  • Petre Foundation
  • Medical Research Council
  • Australian Research Council (DP120104925, DP0985554)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1031688)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
childhood adversity, maternal separation, probiotic supplementation, microbiota-gut-brain axis, risk phenotypes
MeSH terms
Amnesia, Animals, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Maternal Deprivation, Memory, Stress, Psychological, Wills, Cohort Effect, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Probiotics, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review