The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses
Abstract
Mind-sets (aka implicit theories) are beliefs about the nature of human attributes (e.g., intelligence). The theory holds that individuals with growth mind-sets (beliefs that attributes are malleable with effort) enjoy many positive outcomes—including higher academic achievement—while their peers who have fixed mind-sets experience negative outcomes. Given this relationship, interventions designed to increase students’ growth mind-sets—thereby increasing their academic achievement—have been implemented in schools around the world. In our first meta-analysis ( k = 273, N = 365,915), we examined the strength of the relationship between mind-set and academic achievement and potential moderating factors. In our second meta-analysis ( k = 43, N = 57,155), we examined the effectiveness of mind-set interventions on academic achievement and potential moderating factors. Overall effects were weak for both meta-analyses. However, some results supported specific tenets of the theory, namely, that students with low socioeconomic status or who are academically at risk might benefit from mind-set interventions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“among the studies that reported manipulation checks, the meta-analytic effect on academic achievement was significant for studies where the manipulation checks failed but non-significant for studies where the manipulation checks succeeded.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“Overall, the relationship between students' mindsets and academic achievement appears to be, at most, weak, and not always in the hypothesized direction.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“The effect on academic achievement was significant for studies that did not report manipulation checks but nonsignificant for studies that did report manipulation checks.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“Overall, Sisk and colleagues (2018) found a small meta-analytic standardized mean difference between intervention and control groups' academic achievement, favoring the interventions: 𝑑 ̅ = 0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.14].”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“Sisk et al. (2018) found that about 1 /3 of growth mindset intervention studies did not report whether the growth mindset intervention influenced students to have more of a growth mindset.Of those that did, around half failed to demonstrate the intervention changed students' mindsets as intended.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“These inclusion criteria are identical to Sisk et al.'s (2018) inclusion criteria, with two exceptions.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al.'s (2018)
In the citing paper
“Thus, relative to Sisk et al. (2018), the present meta-analysis includes more than double the number of records and nearly double the total number of participants.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“Per-protocol analyses-analyses that only included the 239 schools that administered the treatment as intended-yielded ds = 0.03 and 0.01 for two academic achievement measures (see Sisk et al., 2018).”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“The first meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions in 2018 (which did not account for study quality) elicited conflicting conclusions: The meta-analysis authors (Sisk et al., 2018) concluded that effects of growth mindset interventions on academic achievement were small and cautioned they may be due to extraneous factors; Dweck (2018), the developer of mindset theory, concluded that the same”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 2×
“Pub-lication bias occurs when some results are systematically less likely to be published than others (e.g., studies that find small or null effects; Rosenthal, 1979).”
BackgroundMindset: The New Psychology of Success
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2397 · Cited by 7,804
Sterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schmid, C. H., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002 · Cited by 7,709
(1999) · Cited by 6,308
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x · Cited by 3,784
Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions: A Word From Two Perspectives
Dweck, C., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (1995) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 · Cited by 2,540
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 · Cited by 2,334
P-curve: A key to the file-drawer.
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033242 · Cited by 1,500
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kish L., 1965, Survey sampling
- Williams R., 2012, Paper presented at the annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Copenhagen
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,158
Do Different Types of Intelligence and Its Implicit Theories Vary Based on Gender and Grade Level?
Ayoub, A., Aljughaiman, A. M., Alabbasi, A. M. A., & Hamza, E. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712330 · Cited by 12
Zeeb, H., Ibach, A., Voss, T., & Renkl, A. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104170 · Cited by 12
Gentzis, E., & Dixson, D. D. (2023) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/2372966x.2023.2261835 · Cited by 12
Is an online mindset intervention effective in vocational education?
Glerum, J., Loyens, S. M. M., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1552877 · Cited by 13
The impact of implicit theories on students’ emotional outcomes
Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00750-z · Cited by 12
Lim, S. M., Foo, Y. L., Yeo, M.-F., Chan, C. Y. X., & Loh, H. T. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.25447/sit.24998186 · Cited by 12
Students’ Beliefs About the Nature of Intelligence (Mindset)
de Kraker-Pauw, E., van Wesel, F., Krabbendam, L., & van Atteveldt, N. (2020) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/0743558420967113 · Cited by 12
Hagen, R. V., Lorås, H. W., Sigmundsson, H., & Haga, M. (2021) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.2021-0063 · Cited by 12
Schmitt, A., & Scheibe, S. (2022) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/10690727221120367 · Cited by 11
Growth mindset as a protective factor for middle schoolers at academic risk
Younger, J. W., D’Esposito, Z., Geng, I. S., Haft, S. L., O’Laughlin, K. D., Anguera, J. A., Bunge, S. A., Ferrer, E. E., Hoeft, F., McCandliss, B. D., et al. (2023) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-023-09863-2 · Cited by 11
Oh, J., Han, S. J., & Han, S. H. (2024) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/jwl-01-2024-0013 · Cited by 11
Finnish teachers’ mindsets and conceptions of neuroplasticity
Jääskö-Santala, K., Laine, S., & Tirri, K. A. (2025) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-025-10025-9 · Cited by 11
Xu, W., Sun, Y., Yao, Y., & Zhu, X. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103748 · Cited by 11
Yan, Z., & Mendoza, N. B. (2025) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2025.2534134 · Cited by 11
Does Level of Education Influence the Development of Adolescents’ Mindsets?
Glerum, J., Dimeska, A., Loyens, S. M. M., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10120367 · Cited by 11
Buckley, J., Hyland, T., Gumaelius, L., Seery, N., & Pears, A. (2021) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941211000667 · Cited by 11
Estimating the replicability of technology education research
Buckley, J., Hyland, T., & Seery, N. (2022) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-022-09787-6 · Cited by 11
Mainstream and special schools’ use of well‐being programmes: A regional survey
Nisar, A., Hastings, R. P., Watkins, R. C., & Williams, S. (2023) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3903 · Cited by 11
Evans, M. B., Vierimaa, M., Budziszewski, R., & Graupensperger, S. A. (2019) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2019.1570392 · Cited by 11
The Impact of Self-Theories to Academic Achievement and Soft Skills in Undergraduate CS Studies
Apiola, M.-V., & Laakso, M. (2019) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/3304221.3319766 · Cited by 11
Measuring Student Character: Modernizing Predictors of Academic Success
Kuncel, N. R., Tran, K. V., & Zhang, S. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108559607.016 · Cited by 11
Establishing a Reading Mindset Measure: A Validation Study
Tock, J. L., Quinn, J. M., Otaiba, S. A., Petscher, Y., & Wanzek, J. (2020) · Assessment for Effective Intervention · doi:10.1177/1534508420936753 · Cited by 11
Burgoyne, A. P., Carroll, S. L., Clark, D. A., Hambrick, D. Z., Plaisance, K. S., Klump, K. L., & Burt, S. A. (2020) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101683 · Cited by 11
Self-citationLeis, A. (2021) · Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.31261/tapsla.9098 · Cited by 11
Griffin, N. M., Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2021) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2021.1939821 · Cited by 11
The Hidden Classroom: How Gender Stereotypes Impact Academic Achievement
Gonzalez, A. M., Oh, J. H. J., & Baron, A. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235532.018 · Cited by 11
Zsila, Á., Aruguete, M. S., Shabahang, R., & Orosz, G. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111996 · Cited by 11
Li, J., Zhao, Y., Zhou, S., Pu, Y., He, H., & Zhao, M. (2020) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.328 · Cited by 11
Dweck's social-cognitive model of achievement motivation in science
Lee, Y., Yue, Y., Perez, T., & Linnenbrink‐Garcia, L. (2024) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102410 · Cited by 10
Bennett-Pierre, G., & Gunderson, E. A. (2022) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-022-01340-y · Cited by 10
Pekrun, R. H. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197662359.003.0038 · Cited by 10
Educational and Motivational Predictors of Academic Achievement (Based on PISA 2018 Reading Data)
Гордеева, Т. О., & Sychev, O. A. (2024) · Psychological Science and Education · doi:10.17759/pse.2024290106 · Cited by 10
Underestimating Learning by Doing
Horn, S., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2025) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20240141 · Cited by 10
Does Studying CS Automatically Foster a Growth Mindset?
Lodi, M. (2019) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/3304221.3319750 · Cited by 10
Hard, B. M., Liang, N., Wong, M., & Flusberg, S. J. (2021) · Metaphor and the Social World · doi:10.1075/msw.19021.har · Cited by 10
Components of engagement in saying-is-believing exercises
Lee, H. R., Santana, L. M., McPartlan, P., & Eccles, J. S. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02782-z · Cited by 10
Shifting Beliefs in Computer Science: Change in CS Student Mindsets
Flanigan, A. E., Peteranetz, M. S., Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3471574 · Cited by 10
Hong, Z.-Y., & Chien, C. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102359 · Cited by 10
Brown, C. M., & Hanson, A. E. S. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00135 · Cited by 10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of age-related differences in trustPreprint
Bailey, P. E., & Leon, T. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/we7vh · Cited by 10
False growth mindsets negatively impact student beliefs and performancePreprint
Buttrick, N. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/vbrsc · Cited by 10
Aladwan, S. Q. A., Awamleh, W., Alfayez, M. Q. E., Shaheen, H. R. A., & Abutaha, M. S. T. (2023) · Health Psychology Research · doi:10.52965/001c.89427 · Cited by 10
Positive conditions for mathematics learning: An overview of the research
Fitz, J. A. (2025) · doi:10.54300/967.472 · Cited by 10
Guo, J., Sun, X., & Tang, X. (2025) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-025-10125-6 · Cited by 9
Verberg, F., Helmond, P., Otten, R., & Overbeek, G. J. (2022) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/jir.12970 · Cited by 9
Barnett, M. K., & Macnamara, B. N. (2023) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence11060104 · Cited by 9
Self-citationBakchich, J., Claes, N., Carré, A., & Smeding, A. (2024) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-024-09900-8 · Cited by 9
Teacher support as a context of growth mindset in predicting reading achievement
Cai, Y., Xing, K., & Ge, Q. (2025) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-025-10074-0 · Cited by 9
Implizite Fähigkeitstheorien, akademisches Selbstkonzept und schulisches Wohlbefinden
Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., & Schober, B. (2021) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-021-00130-x · Cited by 9
Sexual growth mindsets and rejection sensitivity in sexual satisfaction
Cultice, R. A., Sanchez, D. T., & Albuja, A. F. (2021) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075211054390 · Cited by 9
Parada, S., & Verlhiac, J. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3944 · Cited by 9
Basarkod, G., & Marsh, H. W. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197662359.003.0010 · Cited by 9
Identifying the Role of Social Relationships in Motivating Students to Learn
Wentzel, K. R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197662359.003.0063 · Cited by 9
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Work
Cunningham, G. B. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003413110 · Cited by 9
Finch, J. E., Saavedra, A., & Obradović, J. (2023) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-023-02666-1 · Cited by 9
Cutumisu, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01794 · Cited by 9
Rajagopalan, M., Sathar, M. B. A., & Parayitam, S. (2022) · FIIB Business Review · doi:10.1177/23197145221113375 · Cited by 9
Conventionality and evidence: two elements of professional development that could matter to teachers
Daniels, L. M., Chazan, D., Goegan, L. D., & Farmer, J. R. (2020) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2020.1763432 · Cited by 9
Open Science 2.0: Large-Scale Collaborative Education ResearchPreprint
Makel, M. C., Smith, K. N., McBee, M. T., Peters, S. J., & Miller, E. M. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ypmjg · Cited by 9
Lowering Activation Barriers to Success in Physical Chemistry (LABSIP): A Community Project
Baiz, C. R., Berger, R., Donald, K. J., de Paula, J. C., Fried, S. D., Rubenstein, B. M., Stokes, G. Y., Takematsu, K., & Londergan, C. H. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.3c07015 · Cited by 9
Brunker, N. (2023) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-023-00640-w · Cited by 8
Qi, C., Guo, X., Liu, C., Li, Y., Zhao, B., Bi, T., & Luo, L. (2024) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-024-02061-z · Cited by 8
Chou, M. (2024) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.23353 · Cited by 8
Donohoe, C., Topping, K. J., & Hannah, E. F. S. (2021) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/02667363.2021.1905613 · Cited by 8
Does implicit theory of intelligence moderate judgment of learning-based study time allocation?
Ikeda, K., Jiang, J., Kakinuma, K., & Tanaka, A. (2022) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101709 · Cited by 8
Malespina, A., Schunn, C. D., & Singh, C. (2023) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.19.020135 · Cited by 8
Toward inclusive and identity safe learning for supporting racialized student achievement
Holden, L. R., Tanenbaum, G. J., & Ashley, A. (2023) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.2477 · Cited by 8
Webber, M., Fitzpatrick, K., Hoskins, T. K., Veukiso-Ulugia, A., Fenaughty, J., Powell, D., & Madden-Smith, A. (2023) · Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online · doi:10.1080/1177083x.2023.2291362 · Cited by 8
Forbes‐McKay, K., Bremner, P. A. M., Johnston, P., & Air, C. (2023) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-06-2023-0253 · Cited by 8
Chen, C., Shen, T., Tang, S. H., Gao, Y., & Wang, D. (2024) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-024-10339-4 · Cited by 8
The psychological complex in contemporary education policy
Gillborn, S., & Delahunty, T. (2025) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2025.2478400 · Cited by 8
Beatty, I. D., Carrino, S. S., Gerace, W. J., Strickhouser, J. E., Elobeid, M. A., & Kane, M. J. (2020) · Physics Education Research Conference (PERC) · doi:10.1119/perc.2019.pr.beatty · Cited by 8
Masterson, L., & Koch, M. (2021) · Investigations in Mathematics Learning · doi:10.1080/19477503.2021.1913382 · Cited by 8
Les théories implicites de l’intelligence : une question de perspectives ?
Godard, A., Arciszewski, T., Énéa-Drapeau, C., & Perret, P. (2021) · Psychologie Française · doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2021.09.001 · Cited by 8
School-led mindset messaging: understanding elementary students’ meaning and emotions
Daniels, L. M., Goegan, L. D., Tulloch, S. L. P., Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2022) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/02667363.2022.2090904 · Cited by 8
El papel de la mentalidad de crecimiento en el desempeño de estudiantes de escuela primaria
Coni, A. G., Saldi, L. B., Villarramos, C., Andrés, M. L., & Juric, L. C. (2022) · Actualidades en Psicología · doi:10.15517/ap.v36i133.45774 · Cited by 8
Marks, R. A., Norton, R. T., Mesite, L. M., Fox, A. B., & Christodoulou, J. A. (2022) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-022-10361-8 · Cited by 8
Ma, Y., Ma, C., & Lan, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1068751 · Cited by 8
Locke, E. A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197662359.003.0003 · Cited by 8
Vanacore, K., Gurung, A., Mcreynolds, A. A., Liu, A. S., Shaw, S. T., & Heffernan, N. T. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3576050.3576073 · Cited by 8
Nieberding, M. N., & Heckler, A. F. (2023) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.19.020111 · Cited by 8
Takehashi, H., Toyosawa, J., Shimai, S., & Yananose, M. (2023) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12469 · Cited by 8
Holden, L. R., & Goldstein, B. M. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14030227 · Cited by 8
Peteranetz, M. S., Soh, L., Shell, D. F., & Flanigan, A. E. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2021.3049721 · Cited by 8
Concordance and discordance in implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness
Snyder, K. E., Makel, M. C., Adelson, J. L., Crawford, B. F., & Barger, M. M. (2021) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101971 · Cited by 8
Schwartz, B. N. (2021) · Culture Medicine and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s11013-021-09712-x · Cited by 8
Campbell, I., & Green, R. (2022) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/02667363.2022.2042207 · Cited by 8
Dweck’s Mindset Theory Applied to Addictions: a Scoping Review
Parada, S., Legrand, E., Taschini, E., Laqueille, X., & Verlhiac, J. (2022) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-022-00427-6 · Cited by 8
Social and Emotional Learning in Schools
DiPerna, J. C., Frey, J. R., & Hart, S. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235532.025 · Cited by 8
Matthes, B., & Stöger, H. (2022) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-022-00157-8 · Cited by 8
Ciaccio, J. B. (2019) · TUScholarShare (Temple University) · Cited by 8
Gaudreau, P., Racine, P., Boileau, L., & Schellenberg, B. J. I. (2025) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-025-10130-9 · Cited by 7
Yang, H., & Wu, X. (2025) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2573687 · Cited by 7
Charoensilp, P., Kim, H., & Sriutaisuk, S. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0337039 · Cited by 7
Park, S., Callahan, C. M., & Ryoo, J. H. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06132-9 · Cited by 7
Yu, J., Janssen, T. W. P., Altikulaç, S., Nieuwenhuis, S., & van Atteveldt, N. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102417 · Cited by 7
Both individual and peer growth mindsets matter for academic resilience
King, R. B., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2026) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-026-00403-z · Cited by 7
A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Model of Students’ Growth-Focused Motivation
Bostwick, K. C. P., Burns, E. C., Martin, A. J., Collie, R. J., & Durksen, T. L. (2024) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2024.2329105 · Cited by 7
The relation between mindset, social comparison, and academic engagement
Yasuda, Y., & Goegan, L. D. (2025) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-025-10018-8 · Cited by 7
Embracing A Growth Mindset: An Experiential Exercise to Explore Beliefs About Learning
Foster, M. K. (2020) · Management Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/2379298120930352 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Macnamara, Brooke N.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-03-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 549-571
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2789363920
- Semantic Scholar
- ee2e51b22572bb6f29021c8bbd12674137bcb6b2
- Cited by
- 1,159
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 148 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 206 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 173 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 24
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- implicit theories of intelligence, academic performance, socioeconomic status, at-risk students, moderators, intelligence beliefs
- MeSH terms
- Academic Success, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Child, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Self Concept, Students, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
