The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses
Abstract
Mind-sets (aka implicit theories) are beliefs about the nature of human attributes (e.g., intelligence). The theory holds that individuals with growth mind-sets (beliefs that attributes are malleable with effort) enjoy many positive outcomes—including higher academic achievement—while their peers who have fixed mind-sets experience negative outcomes. Given this relationship, interventions designed to increase students’ growth mind-sets—thereby increasing their academic achievement—have been implemented in schools around the world. In our first meta-analysis ( k = 273, N = 365,915), we examined the strength of the relationship between mind-set and academic achievement and potential moderating factors. In our second meta-analysis ( k = 43, N = 57,155), we examined the effectiveness of mind-set interventions on academic achievement and potential moderating factors. Overall effects were weak for both meta-analyses. However, some results supported specific tenets of the theory, namely, that students with low socioeconomic status or who are academically at risk might benefit from mind-set interventions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“among the studies that reported manipulation checks, the meta-analytic effect on academic achievement was significant for studies where the manipulation checks failed but non-significant for studies where the manipulation checks succeeded.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“Overall, the relationship between students' mindsets and academic achievement appears to be, at most, weak, and not always in the hypothesized direction.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“The effect on academic achievement was significant for studies that did not report manipulation checks but nonsignificant for studies that did report manipulation checks.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“Overall, Sisk and colleagues (2018) found a small meta-analytic standardized mean difference between intervention and control groups' academic achievement, favoring the interventions: 𝑑 ̅ = 0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.14].”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“Sisk et al. (2018) found that about 1 /3 of growth mindset intervention studies did not report whether the growth mindset intervention influenced students to have more of a growth mindset.Of those that did, around half failed to demonstrate the intervention changed students' mindsets as intended.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“These inclusion criteria are identical to Sisk et al.'s (2018) inclusion criteria, with two exceptions.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al.'s (2018)
In the citing paper
“Thus, relative to Sisk et al. (2018), the present meta-analysis includes more than double the number of records and nearly double the total number of participants.”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al. (2018)
In the citing paper
“Per-protocol analyses-analyses that only included the 239 schools that administered the treatment as intended-yielded ds = 0.03 and 0.01 for two academic achievement measures (see Sisk et al., 2018).”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“The first meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions in 2018 (which did not account for study quality) elicited conflicting conclusions: The meta-analysis authors (Sisk et al., 2018) concluded that effects of growth mindset interventions on academic achievement were small and cautioned they may be due to extraneous factors; Dweck (2018), the developer of mindset theory, concluded that the same”
From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Sisk et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 2×
“Pub-lication bias occurs when some results are systematically less likely to be published than others (e.g., studies that find small or null effects; Rosenthal, 1979).”
BackgroundMindset: The New Psychology of Success
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2397 · Cited by 7,804
Sterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schmid, C. H., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002 · Cited by 7,709
(1999) · Cited by 6,308
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x · Cited by 3,784
Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions: A Word From Two Perspectives
Dweck, C., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (1995) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 · Cited by 2,540
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 · Cited by 2,334
P-curve: A key to the file-drawer.
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033242 · Cited by 1,500
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kish L., 1965, Survey sampling
- Williams R., 2012, Paper presented at the annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Copenhagen
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,158
Hu, X., Sidhu, G. K., & Xin, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935506 · Cited by 64
Overstating the Role of Environmental Factors in Success: A Cautionary Note
Moreau, D., Macnamara, B. N., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2018) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721418797300 · Cited by 63
Self-citationImplicit Theories, Working Memory, and Cognitive Load: Impacts on Creative Thinking
Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L. L., & DeBusk‐Lane, M. (2019) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019835919 · Cited by 63
Gaspard, H., Parrisius, C., Piesch, H., Kleinhansl, M., Wille, E., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Hulleman, C. S. (2021) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000663 · Cited by 62
“Set in Stone” or “Willing to Grow”? Teacher sensemaking during a growth mindset initiative
Patrick, S. K., & Joshi, E. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.009 · Cited by 62
What aspects of online peer feedback robustly predict growth in students' task performance?
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106924 · Cited by 61
Bernardo, A. B. I., Cai, Y., & King, R. B. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12411 · Cited by 62
Noskeau, R., Santos, A., & Wang, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588438 · Cited by 62
An experimental manipulation of the value of effort
Lin, H., Westbrook, A., Fan, F., & Inzlicht, M. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01842-7 · Cited by 60
Yik, B. J., Raker, J. R., Apkarian, N., Stains, M., Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Johnson, E. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00333-3 · Cited by 60
Bernecker, K., & Job, V. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_12 · Cited by 61
Knowledge or Abilities? How Undergraduates Define Intelligence
Limeri, L. B., Choe, J., Harper, H. G., Martin, H. R., Benton, A., & Dolan, E. L. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-09-0169 · Cited by 59
Developing a growth-mindset pedagogy for higher education and testing its efficacy
Sahagun, M. A., Moser, R., Shomaker, J., & Fortier, J. (2021) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100168 · Cited by 60
Adversarial Collaboration: The Next Science Reform
Clark, C. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29148-7_32 · Cited by 60
Henry, M. A., Shorter, S. K., Charkoudian, L. K., Heemstra, J. M., Le, B., & Corwin, L. A. (2021) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00300-4 · Cited by 59
Tynan, M. C., Credé, M., & Harms, P. D. (2019) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101815 · Cited by 58
Richardson, D. R., Bledsoe, R. S., & Cortez, Z. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-11-0238 · Cited by 59
Parada, S., & Verlhiac, J. (2021) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2021.1917519 · Cited by 57
Rubenstein, L. D., Callan, G. L., Ridgley, L. M., & Henderson, A. J. (2019) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2019.02.004 · Cited by 57
Bui, P., Pongsakdi, N., McMullen, J. A., Lehtinen, E., & Hannula‐Sormunen, M. M. (2023) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100554 · Cited by 59
Kim, M., & Park, S. (2021) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22583 · Cited by 54
Yao, Y., Zhu, X., & Zhan, J. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100832 · Cited by 54
Analysis of a mindset intervention
Burgoyne, A. P., Hambrick, D. Z., Moser, J. S., & Burt, S. A. (2018) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.004 · Cited by 54
Self-citationGrowth mindset in the maths classroom: a key to teachers’ well-being and effectiveness
Shoshani, A. (2021) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2021.2007370 · Cited by 53
The development of grit and growth mindset in Chinese children
Zhang, T., Park, D., Ungar, L., Tsukayama, E., Luo, L., & Duckworth, A. L. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105450 · Cited by 53
Grit, Mindset, and Academic Performance: A Study of Pre-University Science Students
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Hu, X. S., Vu, A. T. T., & Yao, J. (2018) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/94570 · Cited by 53
Branigan, H., & Donaldson, D. I. (2020) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100718 · Cited by 52
Perkins, A., Bowers, G., Cassidy, J., Meiser‐Stedman, R., & Pass, L. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23104 · Cited by 52
Advancing the Agency of Adolescent Girls
Edmonds, E. V., Feigenberg, B., & Leight, J. (2021) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01074 · Cited by 51
An evaluation of the factors that influence academic success as defined by engaged students
Lynam, S., Cachia, M., & Stock, R. (2022) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2022.2052808 · Cited by 51
Jiang, Y., Liu, H., Yao, Y., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15032180 · Cited by 51
Vu, T., Scharmer, A. L., van Triest, E., van Atteveldt, N., & Meeter, M. (2024) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2024.2307960 · Cited by 51
Binning, K. R., Wang, M., & Amemiya, J. L. (2018) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0933-3 · Cited by 51
Гордеева, Т. О., Sheldon, K. M., & Sychev, O. A. (2019) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-019-00414-y · Cited by 51
Rindermann, H., Becker, D., & Coyle, T. R. (2020) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406 · Cited by 50
How does growth mindset inform interventions in primary schools? A systematic literature review
Savvides, H., & Bond, C. (2021) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/02667363.2021.1879025 · Cited by 50
Yan, J., Tian, L., & Lou, N. M. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103519 · Cited by 50
Burgoyne, A. P., Harris, L. J., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2019) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101383 · Cited by 50
Self-citationBillingsley, J., Lipsey, N. P., Burnette, J. L., & Pollack, J. M. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02149-w · Cited by 50
Zarrinabadi, N., Rezazadeh, M., & Chehrazi, A. (2021) · International Journal of Multilingualism · doi:10.1080/14790718.2020.1871356 · Cited by 49
Limeri, L. B., Carter, N. T., Lyra, F., Martin, J. W., Mastronardo, H., Patel, J. D., & Dolan, E. L. (2023) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-12-0250 · Cited by 49
Math Mindsets and Academic Grit: How Are They Related to Primary Math Achievement?
Kaya, S., & KARAKOÇ, D. (2022) · European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.30935/scimath/11881 · Cited by 48
Theoretical and methodological directions in mindset intervention research
Canning, E. A., & Limeri, L. B. (2023) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12758 · Cited by 48
Cheong, C. M., Yao, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100785 · Cited by 48
Cutumisu, M. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.026 · Cited by 48
How malleable are cognitive abilities? A critical perspective on popular brief interventions.
Moreau, D. (2021) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000872 · Cited by 48
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2022) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-022-00629-6 · Cited by 47
Shirvan, M. E., Robat, E. S., Alamer, A., Lou, N. M., & Barabadi, E. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09849-2 · Cited by 49
Growth Mindset Messaging in Stigma-Relevant Contexts: Harnessing Benefits Without Costs
Hoyt, C. L., & Burnette, J. L. (2020) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732220941216 · Cited by 48
Noordzij, G., Giel, L. I. S., & van Mierlo, H. (2021) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-021-09606-1 · Cited by 48
Motivational Factors Are Varying across Age Groups and Gender
Sigmundsson, H., Haga, M., Elnes, M., Dybendal, B. H., & Hermundsdottir, F. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19095207 · Cited by 46
Casali, N., Meneghetti, C., Tinti, C., Re, A. M., Sini, B., Passolunghi, M. C., Valenti, A., Montesano, L., Pellegrino, G., & Carretti, B. (2023) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/00222194221150786 · Cited by 47
Lee, Y., & Seo, E. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101800 · Cited by 46
Growth mindset interventions improve academic performance but not mindset in biochemistry
Miller, H. B., & Srougi, M. C. (2021) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.21556 · Cited by 45
Matz, S., Beck, E. D., Atherton, O. E., White, M. J. D., Rauthmann, J. F., Mroczek, D. K., Kim, M.-H., & Bogg, T. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231191774 · Cited by 45
Cutumisu, M., & Lou, N. M. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106445 · Cited by 44
Exploring pre-service language teachers’ mindsets using a sorting activity
Haukås, Å., & Mercer, S. (2021) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2021.1923721 · Cited by 44
He, W., & Chiang, T.-W. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353271 · Cited by 43
The role of peer mindsets in students’ learning: An experimental study
Sheffler, P., & Cheung, C. S.-S. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12299 · Cited by 44
Morris, S., Carlos, C., Kistruck, G. M., Lount, R. B., & Thomas, T. E. (2023) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1472 · Cited by 42
Walker, K. A., & Jiang, X. (2022) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12006 · Cited by 42
Using Theories of Behavior Change to Develop Interventions for Healthy Aging
Klusmann, V., Gow, A. J., Robert, P. H., & Oettingen, G. (2021) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbab111 · Cited by 42
Δημητρίου, Α., Spanoudis, G. C., Christou, C., Greiff, S., Makris, N., Vainikainen, M., Golino, H. F., & Gonida, E. Ν. (2022) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000399 · Cited by 43
Interconnected factors in EFL engagement: classroom climate, growth mindset, and achievement goals
Ma, W., Yang, W., & Bu, Q. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353360 · Cited by 41
Schrodt, K., Elleman, A. M., FitzPatrick, E. R., Hasty, M. M., Kim, J. K., Tharp, T. J., & Rector, H. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1577778 · Cited by 41
Failure to Replicate: Testing a Growth Mindset Intervention for College Student Success
Brez, C. C., Hampton, E. M., Behrendt, L. S., Brown, L., & Powers, J. (2020) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2020.1806845 · Cited by 40
Wanzek, J., Otaiba, S. A., Petscher, Y., Lemons, C. J., Gesel, S. A., Fluhler, S. K., Donegan, R. E., & Rivas, B. K. (2020) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219420949281 · Cited by 41
Muenks, K. M., Yan, V. X., Woodward, N. R., & Frey, S. E. (2021) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102088 · Cited by 41
Xu, J., & Wang, Y. (2022) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102900 · Cited by 40
Campbell, J. A., & Løkken, I. M. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13010029 · Cited by 40
Growth orientation predicts gains in middle and high school students’ mathematics outcomes over time
Bostwick, K. C. P., Martin, A. J., Collie, R. J., & Durksen, T. L. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.010 · Cited by 40
When Do Growth Mindset Interventions Work?
Miller, D. I. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.08.005 · Cited by 40
Whose ability and growth matter? Gender, mindset and performance in physics
Malespina, A., Schunn, C. D., & Singh, C. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00342-2 · Cited by 40
van Atteveldt, N., Tijsma, G., Janssen, T. W. P., & Kupper, F. (2019) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12213 · Cited by 39
Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2020) · Psihologijske teme · doi:10.31820/pt.29.1.3 · Cited by 41
Noetel, M., Parker, P. D., Dicke, T., Beauchamp, M. R., Ntoumanis, N., Hulteen, R. M., Diezmann, C. M., Yeung, A. S., Ahmadi, A., Vasconcellos, D., et al. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09786-6 · Cited by 39
Froehlich, L., Mok, S. Y., Martiny, S. E., & Deaux, K. (2018) · European Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1177/1474904118807539 · Cited by 38
Effect of Growth Mindset on Mental Health Two Years Later: The Role of Smartphone Use
Lai, X., Nie, C., Huang, S., Li, Y., Xin, T., Zhang, C., & Wang, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19063355 · Cited by 38
Mindsets of health and healthy eating intentions
Thomas, F. N., Burnette, J. L., & Hoyt, C. L. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12589 · Cited by 38
Outes-León, I., Sánchez, A., & Vakis, R. (2020) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-9141 · Cited by 39
School Effects on Socio-emotional Development, School-Based Arrests, and Educational Attainment
Jackson, C. K., Porter, S. C., Easton, J. B., Blanchard, A., & Kiguel, S. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26759 · Cited by 38
Boncquet, M., Soenens, B., Verschueren, K., Lavrijsen, J., Flamant, N., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101905 · Cited by 37
The evidence base for advanced learning programs
Plucker, J. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2020) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/0031721720978056 · Cited by 37
Growth Mindset Predicts Cognitive Gains in an Older Adult Multi-Skill Learning Intervention
Sheffler, P., Kürüm, E., Sheen, A. M., Ditta, A. S., Ferguson, L., Bravo, D. Y., Rebok, G. W., Strickland-Hughes, C. M., & Wu, R. (2022) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.1177/00914150221106095 · Cited by 37
Understanding the effects of education through the lens of biology
Sokolowski, H. M., & Ansari, D. (2018) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-018-0032-y · Cited by 38
Sommet, N., Weissman, D. L., Cheutin, N., & Elliot, A. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/xhe3u · Cited by 36
Camacho, A., Alves, R. A., Silva, M., Ferreira, P., Correia, N. E. F. G., & Daniel, J. R. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102127 · Cited by 36
Factors correlated with personal growth initiative among college students: A meta-analysis
Jiao, Z., Chen, Y., & Lyu, C. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28518 · Cited by 36
Fixed or growth: teacher perceptions of factors that shape mindset
Zilka, A., Grinshtain, Y., & Bogler, R. (2019) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2019.1689524 · Cited by 36
Rattan, A., & Ozgumus, E. (2019) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2020.100127 · Cited by 38
Bosch, N. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104190 · Cited by 36
Connection between Teacher Support and Student’s Achievement: Could Growth Mindset Be the Moderator?
Brandišauskienė, A., Bukšnytė-Marmienė, L., Česnavičienė, J., Daugirdienė, A., Kemerytė-Ivanauskienė, E., & Nedzinskaitė, R. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132413632 · Cited by 36
Chen, L., Chang, H., Rudoler, J., Arnardóttir, E., Zhang, Y., Angeles, C. D. L., & Menon, V. (2022) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-022-00146-7 · Cited by 36
Fixed is not the opposite of growth: Item keying matters for measuring mindsets
Grüning, D. J., Rammstedt, B., & Lechner, C. M. (2023) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-023-09866-z · Cited by 35
Does Stereotype Threat Affect Men in Language Domains?
Chaffee, K. E., Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01302 · Cited by 35
Stunted upward mobility in a learning environment reduces the academic benefits of growth mindsets
Jia, L., Lim, C. H., Ismail, I., & Tan, Y. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2011832118 · Cited by 35
Lee, H., Yu, S. L., Kim, M., & Koenka, A. C. (2021) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102023 · Cited by 36
Framework for unpacking students’ mindsets in physics by gender
Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes‐Malach, T. J., & Singh, C. (2022) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.18.010116 · Cited by 35
Psychology needs to get tired of winning
Haeffel, G. J. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.220099 · Cited by 35
Play it safe or play to learn: mindsets and behavioral self-regulation in kindergarten
Compagnoni, M., Karlen, Y., & Merki, K. M. (2019) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-019-09190-y · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Macnamara, Brooke N.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-03-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 549-571
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2789363920
- Semantic Scholar
- ee2e51b22572bb6f29021c8bbd12674137bcb6b2
- Cited by
- 1,159
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 148 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 206 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 173 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 24
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- implicit theories of intelligence, academic performance, socioeconomic status, at-risk students, moderators, intelligence beliefs
- MeSH terms
- Academic Success, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Child, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Self Concept, Students, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
