Cited by 66Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionCultural Differences and ValuesNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

Global variation in subjective well-being predicts seven forms of altruism

Open access
Rhoads, Shawn A., Gunter, Devon, Ryan, Rebecca M., Marsh, Abigail A.·2021·Psychological Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The geographic prevalence of various altruistic behaviors (nonreciprocal acts that improve other people’s welfare) is not uniformly distributed, but whether this reflects variation in a superordinate construct linked to national-level outcomes or cultural values is unknown. We compiled data on seven altruistic behaviors across 48 to 152 nations and found evidence that these behaviors reflect a latent construct positively associated with national-level subjective well-being (SWB) and individualist values, even when we controlled for national-level wealth, health, education, and shared cultural history. Consistent with prior work, our results showed that SWB mediated the relationship between two objective measures of well-being (wealth and health) and altruism ( n = 130). Moreover, these indirect effects increased as individualist values increased within the subset of countries ( n = 90) with available data. Together, our results indicate that altruism increases when resources and cultural values provide objective and subjective means for pursuing personally meaningful goals and that altruistic behaviors may be enhanced by societal changes that promote well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797621994767

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Promoting prosocial behaviour during pandemics and beyond benefits mental and physical health and could help counter the pandemic's widespread adverse mental health effects, especially during lockdown.

    “Additionally, encouraging prosocial behaviour during pandemics and beyond is valuable for mental and physical health, which could help to address the pervasive adverse effects of the pandemic on mental health, particularly during lockdown.31, 32, 33, 34”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhoads, S. A., Gunter, D., Ryan, R. M., & Marsh, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rhoads, Shawn A.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2021-07-08
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
1247-1261
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W3163247549
Cited by
66
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • S&R Foundation (Kuno Award for Applied Social Sciences)
  • National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) Award)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
altruism, subjective well-being, individualism, cross-national variation, cultural values, national wealth, latent constructs, mediation, cross-cultural psychology
MeSH terms
Altruism, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review