The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes
Abstract
This paper builds on the idea that any further development of the concept of 'welfare regime' must incorporate the relationship between unpaid as well as paid work and welfare. Consideration of the privateldomestic is crucial to a gendered understanding of welfare because historically women have typically gained entitlements by virtue of their dependent status within the family as wives and mothers. The paper suggests that the idea of the male-breadwinner family model has served historically to cut across established typologies of welfare regimes, and further that the model has been modified in different ways and to different degrees in particular countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Family Policies in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis
Thévenon, O. (2011) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00390.x · Cited by 663
Which Clients are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test
Jilke, S., & Tummers, L. (2018) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muy002 · Cited by 336
Consequences of Family Policies on Childbearing Behavior: Effects or Artifacts?
Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2008) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00246.x · Cited by 260
Gendering research in political science
Lovenduski, J. (1998) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.333 · Cited by 230
Family Policy and Fertility Intentions in 21 European Countries
Billingsley, S., & Ferrarini, T. (2014) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.12097 · Cited by 128
Gender Equity and Fertility in Italy and Spain
COOKE, L. P. (2009) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279408002584 · Cited by 112
Theorizing European Gender Systems
Duncan, S. (1995) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/095892879500500401 · Cited by 108
The concept of care: Insights, challenges and research avenues in COVID-19 times
Daly, M. (2021) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928720973923 · Cited by 95
The Effect of Gender Policies on Fertility: The Moderating Role of Education and Normative Context
Baizan, P., Arpino, B., & Delclòs, C. E. (2016) · European Journal of Population · doi:10.1007/s10680-015-9356-y · Cited by 85
Developing child-care provision in England and Germany: problems of governance
Evers, A., Lewis, J., & Riedel, B. (2005) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928705054082 · Cited by 80
Self-citationAkpakli, D. E., Manyeh, A. K., Akpakli, J. K., Kukula, V., & Gyapong, M. (2018) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-018-3572-6 · Cited by 68
The Comparative Study of Women’s Movements
Beckwith, K. (2013) · The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.013.0016 · Cited by 28
Wolff, E. A. (2024) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2023.2227120 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, J.
- Venue
- Journal of European Social Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-173
- ISSN
- 0958-9287 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7269
- OpenAlex
- W2103713658
- Cited by
- 2,305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 88.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
