The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selective laser sintering of biocompatible polymers for applications in tissue engineering
Abstract
The ability to use biological substitutes to repair or replace damaged tissues lead to the development of Tissue Engineering (TE), a field that is growing in scope and importance within biomedical engineering. Anchorage dependent cell types often rely on the use of temporary three‐dimensional scaffolds to guide cell proliferation. Computer‐controlled fabrication techniques such as Rapid Prototyping (RP) processes have been recognised to have an edge over conventional manual‐based scaffold fabrication techniques due to their ability to create structures with complex macro‐ and micro‐architectures. Despite the immense capabilities of RP fabrication for scaffold production, commercial available RP modelling materials are not biocompatible and are not suitable for direct use in the fabrication of scaffolds. Work is carried out with several biocompatible polymers such as Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), Polycaprolactone (PCL) and Poly(L‐lactic acid) (PLLA) and a bioceramic namely, Hydroxyapatite (HA). The parameters of the selective laser sintering (SLS) process are optimised to cater to the processing of these materials. SLS‐fabricated scaffold specimens are examined using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Results observed from the micrographs indicate the viability of them being used for building TE scaffolds and ascertain the capabilities of the SLS process for creating highly porous scaffolds for Tissue Engineering applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials
Chia, H. N., & Wu, B. M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Engineering · doi:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 · Cited by 1,734
Hollander, D. A., von Walter, M., Wirtz, T., Sellei, R., Schmidt-Rohlfing, B., Paar, O., & Erli, H.-J. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.041 · Cited by 482
Fiber-based tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and opportunities
Tamayol, A., Akbari, M., Annabi, N., Paul, A., Khademhosseini, A., & Juncker, D. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.007 · Cited by 458
Additive layer manufacturing of poly (ether ether ketone) via FDM
Rinaldi, M., Ghidini, T., Cecchini, F., Brandao, A., & Nanni, F. (2018) · Composites Part B Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029 · Cited by 301
Hajiali, F., Tajbakhsh, S., & Shojaei, A. (2018) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583724.2017.1332640 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, K. H., Chua, C. K., Leong, K. F., Cheah, C. M., Gui, W. S., Tan, W. S., & Wiria, F. E.
- Venue
- Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 113-124
- ISSN
- 0959-2989 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-3619
- OpenAlex
- W1622143753
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective laser sintering of biocompatible polymers for applications in tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0959298920050151-2012
- The paper
- Tan, K. H., Chua, C. K., Leong, K. F., Cheah, C. M., Gui, W. S., Tan, W. S., & Wiria, F. E. (2005). Selective laser sintering of biocompatible polymers for applications in tissue engineering. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959298920050151-2012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.