The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Talk to me: Exploring user interactions with the Amazon Alexa
Abstract
Amazon Alexa is a voice-controlled application that is rapidly gaining popularity. We examined user interactions with this technology, and focused on the types of tasks requested of Alexa, the variables that affect user behaviors with Alexa, and Alexa’s alternatives. The data about Alexa usage were collected from 19 participants via the online questionnaire and diary methods over the course of several days. The results indicate that across all age groups, Alexa was primarily used for checking weather forecasts, playing music, and controlling other devices. Several participants reported using Apple Siri and Google Now applications in addition to Alexa for similar purposes except for controlling other devices. Alexa uses over the weekends were more frequent than on weekdays, but its overall usage tended to decrease over time. The users reported being satisfied with Alexa even when it did not produce sought information, suggesting that the interaction experience is more important to the users than the interaction output. More work is required to understand whether users treat Alexa and similar voice-controlled applications as primarily a traditional information retrieval system, a casual leisure system, a control interface for smart home devices, or, simply, a new toy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research on voice assistants is focused mainly on the general population.”
From Investigating the Accessibility of Voice Assistants With Impaired Users: Mixed Methods Study (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, the studies investigating user experience and usability of voice assistants mainly involved able-bodied users [3,8-11], thereby neglecting a broad community of users with disabilities.”
From Investigating the Accessibility of Voice Assistants With Impaired Users: Mixed Methods Study (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Models in information behaviour research
Wilson, T. D. (1999) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eum0000000007145 · Cited by 2,104
Bhattacherjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148634 · Cited by 1,764
What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology
O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20801 · Cited by 1,397
Luger, E., & Sellen, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858288 · Cited by 1,176
Information Seeking in Electronic Environments
Marchionini, G. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626388 · Cited by 833
Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E., & Sylvain, C. (1996) · The Library Quarterly · doi:10.1086/602864 · Cited by 765
W.Littlejohn, S., & Foss, K. A. (2009) · Encyclopedia of Communication Theory · doi:10.4135/9781412959384.n113 · Cited by 573
Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users
Bilal, D., & Kirby, J. (2002) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(01)00057-7 · Cited by 257
Privacy Concerns for Use of Voice Activated Personal Assistant in the Public Space
Easwara Moorthy, A., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.986642 · Cited by 250
Using diary methods in psychological research.
Iida, M., Shrout, P., Laurenceau, J., & Bolger, N. (2012) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13619-016 · Cited by 232
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Lopatovska I, Fenton M, Campot S (2012) Examining preferences for search engines and their effects on information behavior. In: Proceedings of the 75th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 26–30 October 2012, Baltimore, MD, USA. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/meet.14504901110/pdf (accessed 13 February 2017). · DOI
- Stebbins RA, 2007, Serious Leisure
- Vygotskiĭ LS, 2012, Thought and Language
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mishra, A. A., Shukla, A., & Sharma, S. K. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102413 · Cited by 236
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Göksel, N., & Bozkurt, A. (2019) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8431-5.ch014 · Cited by 193
Abdolrahmani, A., Kuber, R., & Branham, S. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3234695.3236344 · Cited by 172
Conversational Agents: Goals, Technologies, Vision and Challenges
Allouch, M., Azaria, A., & Azoulay, R. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21248448 · Cited by 168
Ramadan, Z. B., Farah, M. F., & Essrawi, L. E. (2020) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21441 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopatovska, I., Rink, K., Knight, I., Raines, K., Cosenza, K., Williams, H., Sorsche, P., Hirsch, D., Li, Q., & Martinez, A.
- Affiliations
- Pratt Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lopatovska, Irene
- Venue
- Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-03-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 984-997
- ISSN
- 0022-2232 (ISSN-L)
- 0961-0006
- 1741-6477
- OpenAlex
- W2794297522
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 17.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- Amazon Alexa, voice assistants, user interaction, task type, user satisfaction, weather forecasting, music playback, Siri, usage patterns, age differences, information retrieval systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
