Cited by 111Psychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory

Abstract

Zimbardo and Boyd (1999) developed the 56-item Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). It has become the leading measure used in the study of subjective time. In this article, we report an abbreviated ZTPI that only includes 15 total items (SZTPI-15). We tested the psychometric characteristics of the SZTPI-15 by focusing on: (a) convergent and discriminant validity, (b) external validity, (c) test–retest reliability and (d) self-peer ratings. On the basis of these tests, the results demonstrated that the short version was less reliable than the standard ZTPI but showed impressive psychometric convergence with the standard ZTPI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0961463x12441174

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Adelabu DH, 2007, Adolescence, 42, 525
  2. Boniwell I, 2005, International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 3, 61
  3. Boyd JN, 2005, Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time: Theory, Research, and Applications, 85
  4. John OP, 1999, Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2nd edn, 102
  5. John OP, 1991, The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54
  6. Lewin K, 1951, Field Theory in the Social Sciences: Selected Theoretical Papers
  7. McGrath J, 1986, Time and Human Interaction: Towards a Social Psychology of Time
  8. Zhang JW and Howell RT (forthcoming) Comparing Three Methods to Measure a Balanced Time Perspective: The Relationship Between a Balanced Time Perspective and Subjective Well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies .
  9. Zimbardo PG, 2008, The Time Paradox
  10. Zuckerman M, 1994, Behavioral Expressions and Biological Bases of Sensation Seeking

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Bowerman, T.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • The Policy Interactive Research, Eugene, Oregon
Corresponding author
Howell, Ryan T.
Venue
Time & Society
Published
2013-08-28
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
391-409
ISSN
  • 0961-463X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7463
OpenAlex
W2117744857
Cited by
111
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Time & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, subjective time, time perspective, abbreviated scale, psychometric validation, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, generalizability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review