Cited by 297Spatial Cognition and NavigationGeography Education and PedagogyCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Exploring and Enhancing Spatial Thinking: Links to Achievement in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics?

Uttal, David H., Miller, David I., Newcombe, Nora S.·2013·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Although neglected in traditional education, spatial thinking plays a critical role in achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. We review this relationship and investigate the malleability of spatial thinking. Can spatial thinking be improved with training, life experience, or educational interventions? Can improving spatial thinking improve STEM achievement? Research indicates that the answer is “yes” to both questions. A recent quantitative synthesis of 206 spatial training studies found an average training improvement of 0.47 standard deviations. Training effects lasted for months in studies examining durability and transferred to tasks that differed at least moderately from training tasks. A few studies indicate that spatial training can improve STEM learning, although more research needs to be done on this issue. We argue that including spatial thinking in STEM curricula could substantially increase the number of Americans with the requisite cognitive skills to enter STEM careers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721413484756

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2013-09-25
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
367-373
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2164574416
Cited by
297
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
18.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
spatial thinking, spatial training, STEM achievement, transfer of training, STEM education, cognitive skills, STEM careers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review