Cognition in a Social Context: A Social-Interactionist Approach to Emergent Phenomena
Abstract
The formation of collective memories, emotions, and beliefs is a fundamental characteristic of human communities. These emergent outcomes are thought to be the result of a dynamical system of communicative interactions among individuals. But despite recent psychological research on collective phenomena, no programmatic framework to explore the processes involved in their formation exists. Here, we propose a social-interactionist approach that bridges cognitive and social psychology to illuminate how microlevel cognitive phenomena give rise to large-scale social outcomes. It involves first establishing the boundary conditions of cognitive phenomena, then investigating how cognition is influenced by the social context in which it is manifested, and finally studying how dyadic-level influences propagate in social networks. This approach has the potential to (a) illuminate the large-scale consequences of well-established cognitive phenomena, (b) lead to interdisciplinary dialogues between psychology and the other social sciences, and (c) be more relevant for public policy than existing approaches.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When stories propagate extensively among individuals, communities converge on the conveyed beliefs and intentions.
“One reason for this is that when stories propagate extensively among individuals, for example, through conversations, the communities converge on the conveyed beliefs and intentions (Vlasceanu et al., 2018).”
From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Vlasceanu et al., 2018
Cites
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0504_2 · Cited by 4,342 · see citing works
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057880 · Cited by 882 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Within these subgroups, the more people talk with one another the more they synchronize their memories, but at a collective level, the community’s memories become more and more divergent (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954).”
BackgroundMnemonic convergence in social networks: The emergent properties of cognition at a collective level
Coman, A., Momennejad, I., Drach, R. D., & Geana, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1525569113 · Cited by 141 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, we found a sizable impact of conversations on the community’s mnemonic convergence with fairly limited social presence (i.e., computer-mediated chat interactions among participants; Coman et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media.
Metzler, H., & Garcia, D. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231185057 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
“…and algorithms, this research needs to incorporate methods from complexity science and computational social science, such as network analysis or agent-based modeling (Borsboom et al., 2021; Jackson et al., 2017; Smith & Conrey, 2007; Vlasceanu et al., 2018) to address these many open questions.”
MethodBridge ties bind collective memories
Momennejad, I., Duker, A., & Coman, A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09452-y · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationWalsh, J., Vaida, N., Coman, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006231161337 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“One reason for this is that when stories propagate extensively among individuals, for example, through conversations, the communities converge on the conveyed beliefs and intentions (Vlasceanu et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGoldenberg, A. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231179154 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vlasceanu, M., Enz, K., & Coman, A.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Coman, Alin
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-09-18
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 369-377
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2891936451
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 22.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- collective memory, collective emotions, collective beliefs, social interaction, emergence, social networks, communication dynamics, interdisciplinary psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review