Cited by 36Behavioral Health and InterventionsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Whither Inhibition?

Open access
Werner, Kaitlyn M., Inzlicht, Michael, Ford, Brett Q.·2022·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Inhibition is considered a process essential to goal pursuit and as a result has become a central construct in many disciplines in psychology and adjacent fields. Despite a century’s worth of debate, however, there is little consensus about what inhibition actually is. We suggest that it is time to abandon the concept of inhibition as it currently stands, given that its definition has been problematic. Instead, we propose an alternative framework in which inhibition is the target outcome, rather than a process to obtain a goal. We leverage existing process models to elucidate how people can achieve an inhibition goal by actively regulating impulses and desires. Although the field has been led astray by classifying inhibition as a process, our framework is intended to provide greater practical utility to the study of goal pursuit moving forward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/09637214221095848

Cites

35 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pattern of results is consistent with recent calls to reconceptualize inhibition as an outcome rather than a process/mechanism that produces outcomes, in which the goal is to inhibit and we rely on other processes including working memory to do so successfully.

    “Finally, this pattern of results is consistent with recent calls to reconceptualize inhibition as an outcome rather than a process/mechanism that produces outcomes (117). In this view, inhibition is not something we use to suppress a response; instead, the goal is to inhibit and we rely on other processes to do so successfully (117), including engaging working memory (this study) to adopt more”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werner, K. M., Inzlicht, M., & Ford, B. Q.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Werner, Kaitlyn M.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2022-07-14
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
333-339
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W4285387348
Cited by
36
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2019-05280)
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Banting Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, Insight Grant #435-2018-0332, Insight Grant #435-2019-0144)
  • University of Toronto Scarborough (UTSC Postdoctoral Research Fellowship)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
inhibition, goal pursuit, impulse control, process model, inhibitory control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review