Cited by 23Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Lamotrigine plus Quetiapine Combination Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression

Ahn, Yong M., Nam, Jennifer Y., Culver, Jenifer L., Marsh, Wendy K., Bonner, Julie C., Ketter, Terence A.·2011·Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Lamotrigine and quetiapine are commonly used in bipolar disorder, but there are no published systematic studies of their use in combination for treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Methods We studied 39 trials in outpatients (15 with bipolar I disorder, 22 with bipolar II disorder, and 1 with bipolar disorder not otherwise specified; 1 patient had 2 trials) with depression resistant to quetiapine or lamotrigine who were taking a mean of 1.7 other prescription psychotropic medications. Patients were given either open-label lamotrigine or quetiapine naturalistically, for up to 12 weeks of combination therapy. Results Lamotrigine (mean dose, 204.2 mg/d) plus quetiapine (mean dose, 188.5 mg/d) increased the euthymia rate (0.0% to 46.2%), decreased syndromal (79.5% to 30.8%) and subsyndromal (20.5% to 15.4%) depression rates, and improved Clinical Global Impression-Severity (mean change, -1.0) and Global Assessment of Functioning (mean change, +5.9) scores. Approximately one-fifth of patients discontinued therapy (20.5%) or required subsequent additional pharmacotherapy (20.5%). Only 10.3% discontinued due to adverse effects, and there was no significant change in mean body weight. Conclusions The findings of this uncontrolled open pilot study must be viewed with caution. However, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are warranted to confirm the possibility that combination therapy with lamotrigine and quetiapine is effective and well tolerated in pat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104012371102300104

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahn, Y. M., Nam, J. Y., Culver, J. L., Marsh, W. K., Bonner, J. C., & Ketter, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Ketter, Terence A.
Venue
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2011-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
17-24
ISSN
  • 1040-1237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-3325
OpenAlex
W2112682118
Cited by
23
References
32
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
lamotrigine, quetiapine, combination therapy, treatment-resistant depression, bipolar depression, bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, euthymia, adverse effects, treatment discontinuation, antipsychotic augmentation
MeSH terms
Quetiapine Fumarate, Lamotrigine, Adult, Affect, Bipolar Disorder, Dibenzothiazepines, Drug Resistance, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Antipsychotic Agents, Triazines, Xerostomia, Treatment Outcome, Antimanic Agents, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review