Cited by 8Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health and Patient Involvement

Frequency of use and Perceived helpfulness of Wellness Strategies for Bipolar and Unipolar Depression

Rosenblat, Joshua D., Simon, Gregory E., Sachs, Gary S., Deetz, Ingrid, Doederlein, Allen, DePeralta, Denisse, Dean, Mary Mischka, McIntyre, Roger S.·2018·Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The majority of research in mood disorders has focused on pharmacologic, psychotherapeutic, and brain stimulation interventions. Conversely, the utility of less structured interventions, such as lifestyle modifications or wellness strategies, has remained understudied. The objective of the current study is to evaluate the frequency of use and perceived helpfulness of wellness strategies for bipolar and unipolar depression. Methods The Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA) conducted an online survey asking participants about the use and helpfulness of wellness strategies. Results In total, 896 participants completed the survey (unipolar depression [n = 447] and bipolar depression [n = 449]). Wellness strategies were used by 62% and 59% of individuals with bipolar and unipolar depression, respectively. Listening to music, socializing, and adequate sleep were commonly reported wellness strategies. The majority of participants reported wellness strategies to be helpful. Use of wellness strategies was associated with greater overall perceived treatment effectiveness (P Conclusions Wellness strategies were commonly used by the majority of respondents. These strategies were subjectively helpful for most respondents and were associated with greater overall treatment effectiveness and increased helpfulness of medications, psychotherapy, and peer support groups. As such, wellness strategies should be considered while developing a holistic treatment plan for depressi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104012371803000407

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenblat, J. D., Simon, G. E., Sachs, G. S., Deetz, I., Doederlein, A., DePeralta, D., Dean, M. M., & McIntyre, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance Chicago, Illinois, USA
Corresponding author
McIntyre, Roger S.
Venue
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2018-11
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
296-304
ISSN
  • 1040-1237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-3325
OpenAlex
W2981737036
Cited by
8
References
18
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
bipolar depression, major depressive disorder, lifestyle intervention, perceived helpfulness, treatment effectiveness, peer support groups, psychotherapy, antidepressants, sleep, music listening, socializing, holistic medicine
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Music Therapy, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review