Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71Disability Education and EmploymentLabour Market and MigrationLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Twice Penalized: Employment Discrimination Against Women with Disabilities

O'Hara, Brett·2004·Journal of Disability Policy Studies
DOI 10.1177/10442073040150010501
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines wage discrimination during the initial stages of employment using panel data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Women with disabilities are twice disadvantaged in the labor market: They face possible discrimination based on both gender and disability status. This article focuses on transitions into new employment. Two key variables indicate the circumstances in which a woman starts working at a new employer: (a) a planned employment transition or (b) finding employment after leaving a former employer for an unplanned reason or after being unemployed. The empirical evidence suggests that wage discrimination is prevalent; discrimination occurs across personal and employment characteristics. Although employment transitions resulted in lower wages, reasonable scenarios that involve personal choices as opposed to discrimination could not be eliminated. For instance, a worker with disabilities may change employers and accept a lower wage if she gains nonwage benefits (e.g., accommodations or health insurance).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10442073040150010501

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Barnartt, S. (1987). The multiple minority status of disabled women . In S. C. Hey, G. Kiger, & J. Seidel (Eds.), Impaired and disabled people in society: Structure, processes and the individual (pp. 290—304). Salem, OR : The Society for Disability Studies and Willamette University.
  2. Lyons, R.F., 1996, Social integration and disability: Clarification of relationship issues in work, family and community
  3. O'Hara, B., 2000, Discrimination against persons with disabilities: Issues in employment transitions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
  4. Szymanski, E., 1999, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 279
  5. Turnbull, H.R., 2001, Policy Studies, 12, 133
  6. Turnbull, H., 2001, Policy Studies, 12, 198

Cited by

See all 71

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
O'Hara, B.
Affiliations
Social Security Administration
Venue
Journal of Disability Policy Studies
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2004-06
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
27-34
ISSN
  • 1044-2073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4802
DOI
10.1177/10442073040150010501
OpenAlex
W1973794913
Cited by
70
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Disability Policy Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
wage discrimination, women with disabilities, disability status, gender discrimination, employment transitions, unemployment, workplace accommodations, nonwage benefits, health insurance, labour market disadvantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.