The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone Sialoprotein
Abstract
The search for a protein nucleator of hydroxyapatite crystal formation has been a focus for the isolation and characterization of the major non-collagenous proteins in bone. Of the proteins characterized to date, bone sialoprotein (BSP) has emerged as the only bona fide candidate for nucleation. BSP is a highly glycosylated and sulphated phosphoprotein that is found almost exclusively in mineralized connective tissues. Characteristically, polyglutamic acid and arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) motifs with the ability to bind hydroxyapatite and cell-surface integrins, respectively, have been conserved in the protein sequence. Expression of the BSP gene, which is induced in newly formed osteoblasts, is up-regulated by hormones and cytokines that promote bone formation and down-regulated by factors that suppress bone formation. Thus, BSP has the biophysical and chemical properties of a nucleator, and its temporo-spatial expression coincides with de novo mineralization in bone and cementum. Moreover, BSP has been associated with mineral crystal formation in several pathologies, including breast carcinomas. However, the ability of BSP to mediate cell attachment and to signal through the RGD motif points to alternate functions for BSP which need further investigation. In combination, the hydroxyapatite-binding polyglutamic acid sequences and the RGD provide bi-functional entities through which BSP may mediate the targeting and attachment of normal and metastasizing cells to the bone surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Osf2/Cbfa1: A Transcriptional Activator of Osteoblast Differentiation
Ducy, P., Zhang, R., Geoffroy, V., Ridall, A. L., & Karsenty, G. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80257-3 · Cited by 4,246
Ross, F. P., Chappel, J., Alvarez, J. I., Sander, D., Butler, W. T., Farach-Carson, M. C., Mintz, K. A., Robey, P. G., Teitelbaum, S. L., & Cheresh, D. A. (1993) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)98430-9 · Cited by 537
McCulloch, C. A. G., & Tenenbaum, H. C. (1986) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1092150410 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Qin, C., Baba, O., & Butler, W. T. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine · doi:10.1177/154411130401500302 · Cited by 439
High-strength silk protein scaffolds for bone repair
Mandal, B. B., Grinberg, A., Seok Gil, E., Panilaitis, B., & Kaplan, D. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1119474109 · Cited by 401
The Role of the Immune Cells in Fracture Healing
Baht, G. S., Vi, L., & Alman, B. A. (2018) · Current Osteoporosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11914-018-0423-2 · Cited by 275
Relationships between degradability of silk scaffolds and osteogenesis
Park, S.-H., Gil, E. S., Shi, H., Kim, H. J., Lee, K., & Kaplan, D. L. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.028 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganss, B., Kim, R. H., & Sodek, J.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-98
- ISSN
- 1045-4411 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-1113
- OpenAlex
- W4211200865
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone Sialoprotein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/10454411990100010401
- The paper
- Ganss, B., Kim, R. H., & Sodek, J. (1999). Bone Sialoprotein. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411990100010401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.