The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Past research examining group cohesion and performance was reviewed using metaanalysis. The results indicated a positive relationship with the average cohesive group performing 18 percentile points above the average noncohesive group. Given the nature of the studies used here (all studies had been previously published), caution is suggested in generalizing these results to "real" work groups.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Groups that are more cohesive tend to be more effective than groups that are less cohesive14.”
From Physiological and Behavioral Synchrony Predict Group Cohesion and Performance (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“This result also fits with prior literature showing a strong relationship between group cohesion and performance14,20 as well as reports that rhythmic synchrony, in addition to fostering cohesion, can improve skills that allow humans to better cooperate and pursue joint goals71.”
From Physiological and Behavioral Synchrony Predict Group Cohesion and Performance (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“experiencing the group as cohesive has been demonstrated to have a strong effect on the group’s objective performance outcomes ( Evans and Dion, 1991 ; Beal et al., 2003 ).”
From Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony Predicts Group Cohesion (2022) · cites this paper as Evans and Dion, 1991
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,896
Goal setting—A motivational technique that works
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1979) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/0090-2616(79)90032-9 · Cited by 1,236
Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1175263 · Cited by 792
Group Dynamics: Research and Theory
Mitchell, G. D., Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. F. (1955) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/586960 · Cited by 609
Symlog, A System for the Multiple Level Observation of Groups
Bales, R. F., Cohen, S. P., & Williamson, S. A. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 461
Cohesiveness and Performance on an Additive Task: Evidence for Multidimensionality
Zaccaro, S. J., & Lowe, C. A. (1988) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1988.9713774 · Cited by 207
Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness
Stogdill, R. M. (1972) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(72)90035-9 · Cited by 170
The Role of Goal Acceptance in Goal Setting and Task Performance
Erez, M., & Kanfer, F. H. (1983) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1983.4284597 · Cited by 162
The Ubiquity of the Technique of Goal Setting in Theories of and Approaches to Employee Motivation
Locke, E. A. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305786 · Cited by 139
Group Cohesiveness as a Determinant of Success and Member Satisfaction in Team Performance
Martens, R., & Peterson, J. A. (1971) · International Review of Sport Sociology · doi:10.1177/101269027100600103 · Cited by 110
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kelly, L., 1985, International Journal of Small Group Research, 1, 182
- Polley, R. B., 1985, InternationalJournal of Small Group Research, 1, 150
- Polley, R. B., Academy of Management meeting
- Rosenthal, R., 1984, Meta-analysis procedures for social research
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 534
On the Function and Structure of Group Cohesion
Severt, J. B., & Estrada, A. X. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1534-085620150000017002 · Cited by 35
Minds in teams: the influence of social and cognitive factors on team learning
den Bossche, P. V. (2006) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20061129pb · Cited by 34
Dreyfus, D., Nair, A., & Rosales, C. R. (2019) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1070 · Cited by 31
Men Faculty Gender-Equity Advocates
Anicha, C. L., Burnett, A., & Bilen‐Green, C. (2015) · The Journal of Men s Studies · doi:10.1177/1060826514561974 · Cited by 31
“Group literature suggests that groups that are cohesive also are more productive (C. R. Evans & Dion, 1991; Gully, Devine, & Whitney, 1995; Mullen & Copper, 1994).”
BackgroundPatient care teams and customer satisfaction: the role of team cohesion
Deeter‐Schmelz, D. R., & Kennedy, K. N. (2003) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876040310501232 · Cited by 31
Using Consensus as a Criterion for Groupness
Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., Bray, S. R., Eys, M., Dorsch, K. D., Estabrooks, P. A., Hall, C. R., Hardy, J., Hausenblas, H. A., Madison, R., et al. (2004) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496404263923 · Cited by 30
Misch, A., Fergusson, G., & Dunham, Y. C. (2018) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2018.1430063 · Cited by 30
“This is in line with previous correlational research suggesting that both euphoric and dysphoric events are associated with increases in identity fusion (Newson et al., 2016), group cohesion (Evans & Dion, 1991; Mullen & Copper, 1994), and interpersonal closeness (Boothby, Clark, & Bargh, 2014).”
ResultVrzáková, H., Amon, M. J., Stewart, A., & D’Mello, S. K. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300572 · Cited by 30
“One type of process loss—coordination loss [18, 36, 58]—occurs when key socio-affective-cognitive (SAC) processes, such as conversation grounding, turn taking, emotion co-regulation, and joint attention, which contribute to overall collaboration quality [3, 15, 20, 26, 27, 32] are disrupted.”
BackgroundA moderated mediation model of intragroup conflict
Suifan, T. S., Alhyari, S., & Sweis, R. J. (2019) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/ijcma-05-2019-0084 · Cited by 30
Effects of serious games on perceived team cohesiveness in a multi-user virtual environment
Bozanta, A., Kutlu, B., Nowlan, N. S., & Shirmohammadi, S. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.042 · Cited by 29
Nurse Relationships and Work Group Disruption
Leppa, C. (1996) · JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/00005110-199610000-00006 · Cited by 29
Rozell, E. J., & Scroggins, W. A. (2010) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/13527591011028915 · Cited by 28
Gordon, I., Gilboa, A., Cohen, S., & Kleinfeld, T. (2020) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113074 · Cited by 30
“Group theory has long emphasized the importance of understanding how individuals bond to form cohesive and efficacious groups [4].”
BackgroundThe effects of local socio-political events on group cohesion in online far-right communities
Bliuc, A.-M., Betts, J. M., Faulkner, N., Vergani, M., Chow, R. J., Iqbal, M., & Best, D. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230302 · Cited by 27
A Multimodal Social Signal Processing Approach to Team Interactions
Lehmann‐Willenbrock, N., & Hung, H. (2023) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/10944281231202741 · Cited by 29
“Several meta-analyses support linkages between cohesion and team performance (e.g., Beal et al., 2003; Castaño et al., 2013; Chiocchio & Essiembre, 2009; Evans & Dion, 1991).”
Drogalas, G., Nerantzidis, M., Mitskinis, D., & Tampakoudis, I. A. (2020) · International Journal of Disclosure and Governance · doi:10.1057/s41310-020-00088-9 · Cited by 27
Does governance structure have any effect on firm performance during the financial crisis
Srivastava, N. K. (2015) · Journal of strategy and management · doi:10.1108/jsma-02-2015-0014 · Cited by 27
Carron, A. V., Martin, L. J., & Loughead, T. M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199731763.013.0016 · Cited by 28
Thiel, C. E., Griffith, J. A., Hardy, J. H., Peterson, D. R., & Connelly, S. (2018) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051817750545 · Cited by 26
“Indeed, teams with withdrawn members rarely communicate (Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009) and fail to establish a collective identity that is critical for team performance (Evans & Dion, 1991).”
BackgroundManata, B. (2019) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051819842792 · Cited by 29
“…would be expected to attenuate both task and social cohesion in groups, which would subsequently affect team effectiveness negatively (see Beal et al., 2003; Carron et al., 2002; Castaño et al., 2013; Chiocchio & Essiembre, 2009; Evans & Dion, 1991; Gully et al., 1995; Mullen & Cooper, 1994).”
BackgroundExploring the association between relationship conflict and group performance.
Manata, B. (2016) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/gdn0000047 · Cited by 25
Effective communication in the context of safe design decision making
Pirzadeh, P., Lingard, H. C., & Blismas, N. G. (2020) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104913 · Cited by 24
Stewart, A., Keirn, Z. A., & D’Mello, S. K. (2018) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/3242969.3242989 · Cited by 24
“Some of the critical variables include group size [37, 38], problem structure [36, 53], cohesiveness of group members in ability and motivation [15, 24, 34], and task constraints [8, 59].”
BackgroundEngendering cohesive software development teams: Should we focus on interdependence or autonomy?
Kakar, A. K. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.11.001 · Cited by 24
“Two meta-analyses ( Evans and Dion, 1991; Mullen and Cooper, 1994 ) have re-ported a positive relationship between cohesiveness and performance.”
Comparison of group cohesion, class participation, and exam performance in live and online classes
Galyon, C. E., Heaton, E. T., Best, T. L., & Williams, R. L. (2015) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9321-y · Cited by 26
Cohesion and individual well-being of members in self-managed teams
Markova, G., & Perry, J. T. (2014) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-04-12-0058 · Cited by 29
Çomu, S., Iorio, J., Taylor, J. E., & Dossick, C. S. (2012) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000610 · Cited by 23
“Evans and Dion (1991) support this claim and identify that the frequency and duration of interactions within cohesive group collaborations contribute to a higher level of performance.”
BackgroundSelecting and Composing Cohesive Teams
Bell, S. T., & Brown, S. G. U. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1534-085620150000017008 · Cited by 23
http://www.ftms.edu.my/journals/IJABM/Apr2016/76-85.pdf
Salman, W. A., & Hassan, Z. (2016) · International Journal of Accounting and Business Management · doi:10.24924/ijabm/2016.04/v4.iss1/76.85 · Cited by 23
The importance of group-fit in new director selection
Elms, N., Nicholson, G. J., & Pugliese, A. (2015) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2014-0598 · Cited by 22
Predicting cooperative work satisfaction of autonomous groups using a wiki tool in higher education
García, C., & Privado, J. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1764590 · Cited by 24
“Furthermore, a relationship between group cohesion, better performance and e ff ective communication was also found (Evans & Dion, 1991).”
BackgroundIndividuum und Handeln – Sportpsychologie
Conzelmann, A., Hänsel, F., & Höner, O. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37546-0_9 · Cited by 22
Therapeutic Environment and Outcomes in a U.K. Domestic Violence Perpetrator Program
Bowen, E. (2010) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496409357081 · Cited by 22
Cohesion in Online Student Teams Versus Traditional Teams
Hansen, D. E. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/0273475315594463 · Cited by 26
“…(2008) study, team cohesion has been shown to relate positively to team satisfaction (Hackman, 1992; Hogg, 1992; Hoyle & Crawford, 1994; Piccoli, Powell, & Ives, 2004) and to team performance (Beal et al., 2003; Evans & Dion, 1991; Hackman & Morris, 1975; Miesing & Preble, 1985; Wolfe & Box, 1988).”
BackgroundAvgerinos, E., Fragkos, I., & Huang, Y. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726719857122 · Cited by 22
“Relationships within horizontal teams, on the other hand, are generally stronger, and motivational states, such as cohesion, are more likely to develop among members of the same hierarchy level (Druckman and Swets, 1988; Horn and Walker, 2008), leading to higher productivity (Evans and Dion, 1991; Gully et al., 1995;…”
BackgroundInfluentialTeam Situation Awareness, Cohesion, and Autonomic Synchrony
Guastello, S. J., Bednarczyk, C., Hagan, R., Johnson, C., Marscisek, L., McGuigan, L. M., & Peressini, A. F. (2022) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208221118301 · Cited by 23
“Cohesive groups perform better overall, although the causal relationship appears reciprocal: Cohesion leads to better performance and shared positive performance experiences lead to further cohesion (Braun et al., 2020; Evans & Dion, 1991; Forsyth, 2021; Lent et al., 2006; Mullen & Copper, 1994).”
Mennecke, B. E., Hoffer, J. A., & Valacich, J. S. (2002) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1995.375734 · Cited by 21
“It is likely that the influence of the independent variables will be moderated by the feelings members have toward one another (Dorfman & Stephen, 1984; Evans & Dion, 1991; Levine & Moreland, 1990).”
BackgroundThe Impact of Group Cohesiveness on Organizational Performance: The Nigerian Case
Banwo, A. O., Du, J., & Onokala, U. (2015) · International Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.5539/ijbm.v10n6p146 · Cited by 20
“While early studies did not present a methodical linkage between performance and cohesion (Stogdill, 1972), Evans and Dion (1991, 2012) in their meta-analytic studies posited the effect of cohesion-performance to be more positive and stronger in smaller groups than larger groups.”
BackgroundThe Impact of Team Characteristics on the Course and Outcome of Intergroup Price Negotiations
Backhaus, K., van Doorn, J., & Wilken, R. (2008) · Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing · doi:10.1080/15470620802325773 · Cited by 20
Effectiveness of Project Teams and their Impact on the Performance of Saudi Construction Projects
Assaf, S., Hassanain, M. A., & Mughal, H. (2014) · Research Journal of Applied Sciences Engineering and Technology · doi:10.19026/rjaset.7.911 · Cited by 20
“In addition, there is an important and positive relationship between team performance and commitment of members towards team goals (Evans and Dion, 1991).”
BackgroundCawkill, P., Rogers, A., Knight, S., Spear, L., & Building, G. (2010) · Cited by 20
A STUDY OF GROUP HATE IN A COURSE ON SMALL GROUP COMMUNICATION
Myers, S. A., & Goodboy, A. K. (2005) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.97.2.381-386 · Cited by 20
What’s in a Friendship? Partner Visibility Supports Cognitive Collaboration between Friends
Brennan, A., & Enns, J. T. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143469 · Cited by 20
Mennecke, B. E., & Bradley, J. H. (1998) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.1998.11647370 · Cited by 20
Young drivers and their passengers: crash risk and group processes
Engström, I. (2008) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 20
Treatment Preferences of Older Adults with Substance Use Problems
Holland, J. M., Rozalski, V., Beckman, L., Rakhkovskaya, L. M., Klingspon, K. L., Donohue, B. C., Williams, C., Thompson, L. W., & Gallagher-Thompson, D. E. (2015) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2015.1101633 · Cited by 19
“Consistent with research demonstrating the importance of therapeutic alliance and group cohesion in predicting treatment outcomes (Evans & Dion, 1991; Martin, Garske, & Davis, 2000), relational issues with therapists and other clients were mentioned as being vital to the change process.”
ResultTeam Performance as a Joint Function of Team Member Satisfaction and Agreeableness
Kong, D. T., Konczak, L. J., & Bottom, W. P. (2015) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496414567684 · Cited by 24
Raising the Cohesion and Vitality of Online Communities by Reducing Privacy Concerns
Pan, Y. C., Wan, Y., Fan, J., Liu, B., & Archer, N. (2017) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1234281 · Cited by 20
“High cohesion among group members will improve group performance [24] and creativity [60].”
BackgroundSupporting Employee Participation: Attitudes and Perceptions in Trainees, Employees and Teams
Langan‐Fox, J., Code, S., Gray, R., & Langfield‐Smith, K. (2002) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430202005001807 · Cited by 21
Small Group Socialization Scale
Riddle, B. L., Anderson, C. M., & Martin, M. M. (2000) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640003100503 · Cited by 19
Balta, M. E. (2008) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) · Cited by 19
The Science (and Practice) of Teamwork: A Commentary on Forty Years of Progress…
Salas, E., Linhardt, R. M., & Castillo, G. F. (2024) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964241274119 · Cited by 30
“For example, Evans and Dion (1991) conducted a meta-analysis of team cohesion where they found a moderate effect on performance, and Gully et al. (2002) refined these findings by pointing out this relationship was moderated by task interdependence.”
Zhang, Y., Fong, P. S. W., & Agyemang, D. Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132313447 · Cited by 18
Connecting the Dots Towards Collaborative AIED: Linking Group Makeup to Process to Learning
Stewart, A., & D’Mello, S. K. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_40 · Cited by 18
Getting Roped In: Group Cohesion, Trust, and Efficacy Following a Ropes Course Intervention
Eatough, E. M., Chang, C.-H. D., & HALL, N. R. S. (2015) · Performance Improvement Quarterly · doi:10.1002/piq.21183 · Cited by 18
A Definition of Small Group Democracy
Gastil, J. (1992) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496492233002 · Cited by 18
Forgas, J. P. (2012) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203720752-26 · Cited by 19
Satterfield, J. M. (1998) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/s1077-7229(98)80021-7 · Cited by 18
Group Development and Group Dynamics in Outdoor Education.
McAvoy, L. H., Mitten, D. S., Stringer, L., Steckart, J. P., & Sproles, K. K. (1996) · Cited by 18
Orvis, K. A., Orvis, K. L., Belanich, J., & Mullin, L. N. (2005) · doi:10.21236/ada437016 · Cited by 21
Röttgers, D. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.013 · Cited by 17
Eloy, L., Spencer, C. A., Doherty, E. J., & Hirshfield, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579598 · Cited by 19
Leadership and Six Sigma project success: the role of member cohesiveness and resource management
Wu, K., Yang, L., & Chiang, I.-C. (2011) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2011.586650 · Cited by 18
The Impact of Collaboration and Competition on Project Performance
Avital, M., & Singh, B. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 17
Integrating group dynamics and cognitive-behavioral groups: A hybrid model.
Satterfield, J. M. (1994) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1994.tb00019.x · Cited by 17
Griffith, J. E. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01610.x · Cited by 17
Student success in teams: intervention, cohesion and performance
Croy, G., & Eva, N. (2018) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-11-2017-0174 · Cited by 17
The effect of failure on performance over time: The case of cardiac surgery operations
Avgerinos, E., Gokpinar, B., & Fragkos, I. (2019) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1068 · Cited by 17
“Shared work experience also provides greater levels of trust among members (Faraj & Sproull, 2000) and helps to develop cohesion (Evans & Dion, 1991; Mullen & Copper, 1994; Gully et al., 1995), which in turn improves performance (George & Bettenhausen, 1990; Vinokur-Kaplan, 1995).”
BackgroundGroß, C., Debus, M. E., Ingold, P. V., & Kleinmann, M. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2547 · Cited by 19
“Thus, group members become more willing to advance the group's goals, participate in its activities, and contribute to the group's success (e.g., Evans & Dion, 1991; Mullen & Copper, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialEvery Cloud Has a Silver Lining: Positive Effects of Deviant Coworkers
Markova, G., & Folger, R. G. (2012) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.671201 · Cited by 19
Insights From Cult Survivors Regarding Group Support
DUROCHER, N. (1999) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/29.4.581 · Cited by 16
Shankar, S., & Tewari, V. (2021) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/09722629211012256 · Cited by 21
“…is team cohesion and team effectiveness have a positive impact on psychological safety of the teams, and that is supported in various literatures (Evans & Dion, 1991; Mathieu et al., 2008), but there is also a negative coefficient of leader’s behaviour and social skills in the team psychological…”
BackgroundVideogame-Based Training Success: The Impact of Trainee Characteristics - Year 2
Orvis, K. A., Horn, D. B., & Belanich, J. (2006) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 15
Bourbousson, J., & Fortes-Bourbousson, M. (2016) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1229041 · Cited by 15
The Effects of Team Flow on Performance: A Video Game Experiment
Keith, M. J., Anderson, G., Dean, D. L., & Gaskin, J. E. (2014) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 15
What Matters for Team Cohesion Measurement? A Synthesis
Grossman, R., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D., & Salas, E. (2015) · Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice · doi:10.1108/s1534-085620150000017007 · Cited by 16
Gays in the U.S. Military: Reviewing the Research and Conceptualizing a Way Forward
Estrada, A. X., Dirosa, G. A., & DeCostanza, A. H. (2013) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2013.744676 · Cited by 14
Strengthening the bond and enhancing team performance
Lu, L., & Fan, H.-L. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-10-2016-0062 · Cited by 17
Lehtovaara, J., Seppänen, O., & Peltokorpi, A. (2022) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2022.2039399 · Cited by 14
Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?
Wing, R. R., Leahey, T. M., Jeffery, R. W., Johnson, K., Hill, J. O., Coday, M., & Espeland, M. A. (2013) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.20526 · Cited by 14
van Beek, A. P. A., Wagner, C., Frijters, D. H. M., Ribbe, M. W., & Groenewegen, P. (2013) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.03.006 · Cited by 14
Fullagar, C. J. A., & Egleston, D. O. (2008) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00404.x · Cited by 14
Tenure matters for team cohesion and performance: the moderating role of trust in the coach
Abrantes, A. C. M., Mach, M., & Ferreira, A. I. (2020) · European Sport Management Quarterly · doi:10.1080/16184742.2020.1784247 · Cited by 17
“In the particular case of performance, the evidence is solid with several meta-analyses positively linking cohesion to performance (Beal et al., 2003; Carron, Colman, et al., 2002; Castaño et al., 2013; Evans & Dion, 1991; Mullen & Copper, 1994).”
BackgroundAutomatic Prediction of Group Cohesiveness in Images
Ghosh, S., Dhall, A., Sebe, N., & Gedeon, T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2020.3026095 · Cited by 14
Experience, gender composition, social presence, decision process satisfaction and group performance
Wong, Y. K., Shi, Y., & Wilson, D. M. (2004) · OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) · doi:10.5555/984720.984805 · Cited by 13
Work Pressure as a Determinant of Work Group Behavior
Klein, S. M. (1996) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496496272006 · Cited by 13
RELATIONSHIPS OF COLLECTIVE ORIENTATION AND COHESION TO TEAM OUTCOMES
Miles, J. A. (2000) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.2000.86.2.435 · Cited by 13
Сидоренков, А. В., & Borokhovski, E. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13050361 · Cited by 19
“[9,10,54,55], from different fields of activity: sports [11,56], military [57], labor—design and development, manufacturing, services [8,58,59], entrepreneurial [60], as well as virtual teams [61].”
BackgroundCasotti, A. L. N., & Krohling, R. A. (2023) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2023.106444 · Cited by 12
Chien, S.-W., Lin, H.-C., & Shih, C. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.06.001 · Cited by 12
External Factors and Athletic Performance
Dahl, K. D. (2013) · Digital Commons (Liberty University) · Cited by 12
Leveraging affiliations by marketing to and through associations
Roy, A., & Berger, P. D. (2005) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.002 · Cited by 12
Aberdeen, S. M., Leggat, S. G., & Barraclough, S. (2010) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301209354022 · Cited by 12
Using online learner trace data to understand the cohesion of teams in higher education
Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimovíc, S., Großmann, G., Ladjal, D., Marshall, R., & Pardo, A. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12829 · Cited by 14
Board size and firm performance in the property-liability insurance industry
Pacini, C., Hillison, W., & Marlett, D. C. (2009) · Research in finance · doi:10.1016/s0196-3821(07)00210-9 · Cited by 11
Relationship between Team Member Personality and Team Cohesion
Aeron, S., & Pathak, S. (2012) · Management and Labour Studies · doi:10.1177/0258042x13484839 · Cited by 11
The Effect of Team-Building on Team Process and Performance
Bartlett, A. L., Probber, J., & Mohammed, S. (1999) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/109634809902300305 · Cited by 12
“Cohesiveness has generally been found to be positively related to performance (Evans & Dion, 1991; Guzzo & Shea, 1992; Mullen & Copper, 1994).”
BackgroundKo, J. (2005) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 11
Interpersonal Synchrony Research in Human Groups
Gordon, I. (2025) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.70068 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Small Group Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-186
- ISSN
- 1046-4964 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8278
- OpenAlex
- W2121543743
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Small Group Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- group cohesion, group performance, work teams, small groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review