Cited by 567Health Policy Implementation ScienceInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingEvaluation and Performance Assessment

Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development

Open access
Dearing, James W.·2009·Research on Social Work Practice

Abstract

Few social science theories have a history of conceptual and empirical study as long as does the diffusion of innovations. The robustness of this theory derives from the many disciplines and fields of study in which diffusion has been studied, from the international richness of these studies, and from the variety of new ideas, practices, programs, and technologies that have been the objects of diffusion research. Early theorizing from the beginning of the 20th century was gradually displaced by post hoc empirical research that described and explained diffusion processes. By the 1950s, diffusion researchers had begun to apply the collective knowledge learned about naturalistic diffusion in tests of process interventions to affect the spread of innovations. Now, this purposive objective has given form to a science of dissemination in which evidence-based practices are designed a priori not just to result in internal validity but to increase the likelihood that external validity and diffusion both are more likely to result. Here, I review diffusion theory and focus on seven concepts—intervention attributes, intervention clusters, demonstration projects, societal sectors, reinforcing contextual conditions, opinion leadership, and intervention adaptation—with potential for accelerating the spread of evidence-based practices, programs, and policies in the field of social work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049731509335569

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers have often conceptualized sustainability as the final stage in the overall life cycle of an intervention, including development, adoption, implementation, and sustainability.

    “Researchers have often conceptualized sustainability as the final stage in the overall life cycle of an intervention, including development, adoption, implementation (with potential adaptations), and sustainability (14, 31, 52, 110, 115, 118).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Howell JM Higgins CA 1990 Champions of technological innovations Administrative Sciences Quarterly 35 317 341
  2. Katz E 1963 August The characteristics of innovations and the concept of compatibility Rehovoth Conference on Comprehensive Planning of Agriculture in Developing Countries Rehovoth, Israel
  3. Massoud MR Nielsen GA Nolan K Nolan T Schall MW Sevin C 2006 A framework for spread: From local improvements to system-wide change IHI Innovation Series white paper Cambridge, MA Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dearing, J. W.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Dearing, James W.
Venue
Research on Social Work Practice
Published
2009-06-05
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
503-518
ISSN
  • 1049-7315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7581
OpenAlex
W2078154342
Cited by
567
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 27
FWCI
26.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Social Work Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P20CA137219)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
diffusion of innovations, intervention development, evidence-based practice dissemination, pilot project, contextual factors, opinion leadership, intervention adaptation, social work practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review