Cited by 21Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Mental health professionals’ attitudes towards virtual reality therapies: a systematic review

Open access
Bin, Shiyi, Alrashdi, Duaa H., Whitehead, Tamara, Riches, Simon, Drini, Eugenia·2025·Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science

Abstract

Abstract Virtual reality (VR) therapies show promise in mental health treatment, yet their adoption in clinical practice remains limited. Understanding mental health professionals’ attitudes is crucial for successful implementation. A systematic search was conducted by the first author with support from a librarian in eight databases (PubMed [1966], PsycINFO [1967], Web of Science [1900], Scopus [1966], Medline [1946], Global Health [1973], Embase [1974], and PsycExtra [1908]), Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global until May 9th 2024. Twenty studies (2010–2024) from Europe ( n = 11), North America ( n = 5), Oceania ( n = 3), and Asia ( n = 1), comprising 1300 mental health professionals, meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research. The methodological quality of the included studies was moderate to high, but some limitations in sampling strategies. Data were synthesized using narrative synthesis. Results indicated that while only 3% of mental health professionals reported using VR in clinical settings, they predominantly held positive attitudes towards VR therapies but identified numerous barriers. Key facilitators included VR’s accessibility, safety and controllability (the therapist’s ability to customize stimulus according to patients’ needs), and increased patient engagement. Key barriers encompassed technical limitations, high cost, treatment suitability concerns, potential side effects, workload, and time investment. The findings highlight the need for targeted training programs, improved technological infrastructure, and clearer guidelines to support VR therapies in mental health practice. Future research could focus on ways to address these limitations and using facilitators to enhance VR adoption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41347-025-00499-x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VR has demonstrated outstanding performance and efficacy in exposure therapy.

    “Although VR has demonstrated outstanding performance and efficacy in exposure therapy, it may be unfamiliar or even intimidating to clients with anxiety or panic disorders and counselors who empathize with and care for them [52].”

    From Exploring Predictors of Counselors’ Acceptance of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy With Resistance and Job Contexts as Moderators: Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Introduction describes VR exposure therapy as particularly valuable for trauma-related disorders and phobias, and the Results report advantages such as customizable exposure tasks. But the review does not establish the claimed “outstanding” efficacy; its Results also describe clinicians’ concerns about effectiveness and the evidence for it. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • VR may be unfamiliar or even intimidating to clients with anxiety or panic disorders and counselors who empathize with and care for them.

    “Although VR has demonstrated outstanding performance and efficacy in exposure therapy, it may be unfamiliar or even intimidating to clients with anxiety or panic disorders and counselors who empathize with and care for them [52].”

    From Exploring Predictors of Counselors’ Acceptance of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy With Resistance and Job Contexts as Moderators: Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results report patient reluctance toward unfamiliar VR treatments and clinicians’ discomfort with the technology; they also note clinicians’ doubts about VR’s suitability for patients with acute anxiety. The review does not specifically establish that clients with panic disorders find VR intimidating, or that counselors’ concern arises from empathizing with those clients. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these Results passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sutcliffe, K., Harden, A., Noyes, J., Thomas, J., & Garside, R. (2024). Integrating qualitative and quantitative review evidence (Draft version, February 2024). In J. Noyes & A. Harden (Eds.), Cochrane-Campbell handbook for qualitative evidence synthesis (Version 1). Cochrane.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bin, S., Alrashdi, D. H., Whitehead, T., Riches, S., & Drini, E.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Drini, Eugenia
Venue
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Published
2025-03-10
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
146-169
ISSN
2366-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408284991
Cited by
21
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 7
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
virtual reality therapy, mental health professionals' attitudes, technology adoption, implementation barriers, implementation facilitators, clinical practice, therapist training, patient engagement, adverse effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review