Cited by 301Smoking Behavior and CessationSchool Health and Nursing EducationSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Effects of a Social-Network Method for Group Assignment Strategies on Peer-Led Tobacco Prevention Programs in Schools

Open access
Valente, Thomas W., Hoffman, Beth R., Ritt-Olson, Annamara, Lichtman, Kara, Johnson, C. Anderson·2003·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. Our study tested the effectiveness of network methods for identifying opinion leaders and for constructing groups. Methods. Three conditions—random, teacher, and network—were randomly assigned to 84 6th-grade classrooms within 16 schools. Pre- and postcurriculum data on mediators of tobacco use were collected from 1961 students. Peer leaders in the network condition were identified by student nominations, and those leaders were matched with the students who nominated them. Results. Students in the network condition relative to the random condition liked the prevention program more and had improved attitudes (β = −0.06; P < .01), improved self-efficacy (β = −0.10; P < .001), and decreased intention to smoke (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38, 0.55). Conclusions. The network method was the most effective way to structure the program. Future programs may refine this technique and use it in other settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.93.11.1837

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence that identifying leaders and forming groups around them, or forming groups and identifying leaders within them, are effective approaches.

    “There is some evidence that identifying leaders and forming groups around them [58]; or forming groups and identifying leaders within them are also effective approaches [69].”

    From Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation (2015) · cites this paper as [58]

  • Who delivers the program, and the social context of its receipt has a strong impact on program appeal and impact.

    “Research has shown that who delivers the program, and the social context of its receipt has a strong impact on program appeal and impact [22, 58].”

    From Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation (2015) · cites this paper as [58]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valente, T. W., Hoffman, B. R., Ritt-Olson, A., Lichtman, K., & Johnson, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2003-11
Volume
93
Issue
11
Pages
1837-1843
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2131611628
Cited by
301
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Southern California
  • National Cancer Institute (P50 CA 84735-01, P50CA084735)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
tobacco use prevention, peer-led intervention, social network analysis, opinion leaders, group assignments, school-based health programs, sixth grade students, smoking intention, self-efficacy, program effectiveness
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Child, Child Behavior, Child Health Services, Curriculum, Faculty, Female, Health Education, Humans, Leadership, Male, Peer Group, Random Allocation, School Health Services, Self-Help Groups, Smoking, Social Conformity, Social Support, Los Angeles, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review