CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 154Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interventions to Prevent and Reduce Cyber Abuse of Youth: A Systematic Review

Mishna, Faye, Cook, Charlene, Saini, Michael, Wu, Meng-Jia, MacFadden, Robert·2011·Research on Social Work Practice
DOI 10.1177/1049731509351988
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives: The Internet has created a new communication tool, particularly for young people whose use of electronic communication is exploding worldwide. While there are many benefits that result from electronic-based communication, the Internet is concurrently a potential site for abuse and victimization. Methods: This paper systematically reviews the effectiveness of cyber abuse interventions in increasing Internet safety knowledge and decreasing risky online behavior. Results: Significant results were found between pre- and posttest scores related to Internet safety knowledge. Most results related to risky online behavior were not significant. Conclusions: Results provide evidence that participation in psychoeducational Internet safety interventions is associated with an increase in Internet safety knowledge but is not significantly associated with a change in risky online behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049731509351988

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Aloysius, C. ( 2001). The media response: A journalist’s view of the problem in Asia. In C. A. Arnaldo (Ed.), Child abuse on the Internet: Ending the silence (pp. 157-162). Paris: Berghahn Books and UNESCO.
  2. Arnaldo, C.A. & Finnström, A. (1998). Youth and communication . In U. Carlsson & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children and media violence (pp. 35-41). Göteborg: The UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children and Violence on the Screen .
  3. Berson, I.R., 2002, Meridian: A Middle School Technologies Journal, 5, 1
  4. Blais, J., 2008, Chatting, befriending, and bullying. Adolescents’ Internet experiences and associated psychosocial outcomes
  5. Brookshire, M., 2005, Evaluation of the effectiveness of the NetSmartz program: A study of Maine public schools
  6. Chibnall, S., 2006, Final Report
  7. Crombie, G., 2003, Children and Internet safety: An evaluation of the Missing Program. A report to the Research and Evaluation Section of the National Crime Prevention Centre of Justice Canada
  8. Durkin, K. & Low, J. ( 1998). Children, media and aggression: Current research in Australia and New Zealand. In U. Carlsson & C. von Feilitzen (Eds.), Children and media violence (pp. 107-124). Göteborg: The UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children and Violence on the Screen .
  9. Finkelhor, D., 2000, National Center for Missing & Exploited Children
  10. Gray, S., 2005, Internet safety and the intermediate student
  11. Greenfield, P., 2001, A report for NetAlert and the Australian Broadcasting Authority
  12. KidSmart., 2002, Childnet’s Kidsmart Schools Internet Safety Project
  13. Salvatore, A., 2006, Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 67, 891
  14. Schrock, A., 2008, Research Advisory Board Report for the Internet Safety Technical Task Force
  15. Sellier, H. ( 2001). The world citizens’ movement to protect innocence in danger. In C. A. Arnaldo (Ed.), Child abuse on the Internet: Ending the silence (pp. 173-175). Paris: Berghahn Books and UNESCO.
  16. Wishart, J.M., 2005, Evaluation of the ‘Getting to Know IT All’ presentation as delivered in UK schools during November 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–152 of 152

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mishna, F., Cook, C., Saini, M., Wu, M.-J., & MacFadden, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Mishna, Faye
ORCID
Venue
Research on Social Work Practice
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2010-01-11
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
5-14
ISSN
  • 1049-7315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7581
DOI
10.1177/1049731509351988
OpenAlex
W2031392157
Cited by
154
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Research on Social Work Practice (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Law › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Keywords
online abuse, youth, cyber victimization, online safety, psychoeducational intervention, risky online behavior, online communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review