Cited by 1,497Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization

Hinduja, Sameer, Patchin, Justin W.·2008·Deviant Behavior

Abstract

Victimization on the Internet through what has been termed cyberbullying has attracted increased attention from scholars and practitioners. Defined as “willful and repeated harm inflicted through the medium of electronic text” (Patchin and Hinduja 2006 Patchin , J. W. and S. Hinduja . 2006 . “Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard: A Preliminary Look at Cyberbullying.” Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 4 ( 2 ): 148 – 169 .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]:152), this negative experience not only undermines a youth's freedom to use and explore valuable on-line resources, but also can result in severe functional and physical ramifications. Research involving the specific phenomenon—as well as Internet harassment in general—is still in its infancy, and the current work seeks to serve as a foundational piece in understanding its substance and salience. On-line survey data from 1,378 adolescent Internet-users are analyzed for the purposes of identifying characteristics of typical cyberbullying victims and offenders. Although gender and race did not significantly differentiate respondent victimization or offending, computer proficiency and time spent on-line were positively related to both cyberbullying victimization and offending. Additionally, cyberbullying experiences were also linked to respondents who reported school problems (including traditional bullying), assaultive behavior, and substance use. Implications for addressing this novel form of youthful deviance are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01639620701457816

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Florida Atlantic University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire (US)
Corresponding author
Hinduja, Sameer
Venue
Deviant Behavior
Published
2008-01-22
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
129-156
ISSN
  • 0163-9625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0456
OpenAlex
W2000453371
Cited by
1,497
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 113 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 82
FWCI
55.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Deviant Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyber victimization, adolescents, computer proficiency, online time, school problems, traditional bullying, assaultive behavior, substance use, gender differences, racial differences, youth deviance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review