Cited by 1,580Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Electronic Bullying Among Middle School Students

Kowalski, Robin M., Limber, Susan P.·2007·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose Electronic communications technologies are affording children and adolescents new means of bullying one another. Referred to as electronic bullying, cyberbullying, or online social cruelty, this phenomenon includes bullying through e-mail, instant messaging, in a chat room, on a website, or through digital messages or images sent to a cell phone. The present study examined the prevalence of electronic bullying among middle school students.Methods A total of 3,767 middle school students in grades 6, 7, and 8 who attend six elementary and middle schools in the southeastern and northwestern United States completed a questionnaire, consisting of the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire and 23 questions developed for this study that examined participants' experiences with electronic bullying, as both victims and perpetrators.Results Of the students, 11% that they had been electronically bullied at least once in the last couple of months (victims only); 7% indicated that they were bully/victims; and 4% had electronically bullied someone else at least once in the previous couple of months (bullies only). The most common methods for electronic bullying (as reported by both victims and perpetrators) involved the use of instant messaging, chat rooms, and e-mail. Importantly, close to half of the electronic bully victims reported not knowing the perpetrator's identity.Conclusions Electronic bullying represents a problem of significant magnitude. As children's use of electronic communications technologies is unlikely to wane in coming years, continued attention to electronic bullying is critical. Implications of these findings for youth, parents, and educators are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P.
Affiliations
Clemson University (US)
Corresponding author
Kowalski, Robin M.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
S22-S30
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122263961
Cited by
1,580
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 139 · 2014: 131 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 119
FWCI
47.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, junior high school students, bullying prevalence, bullying victims, bullying perpetrators, instant messaging, chat rooms, email, Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Communications Media, Electronics, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Behavior, Students, United States, Prevalence, Chi-Square Distribution, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review