Cited by 275Counseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Effectiveness of Solution-Focused Brief Therapy: A Systematic Qualitative Review of Controlled Outcome Studies

Gingerich, Wallace J., Peterson, Lance T.·2013·Research on Social Work Practice

Abstract

Objective: We review all available controlled outcome studies of solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) to evaluate evidence of its effectiveness. Method: Forty-three studies were located and key data abstracted on problem, setting, SFBT intervention, design characteristics, and outcomes. Results: Thirty-two (74%) of the studies reported significant positive benefit from SFBT; 10 (23%) reported positive trends. The strongest evidence of effectiveness came in the treatment of depression in adults where four separate studies found SFBT to be comparable to well-established alternative treatments. Three studies examined length of treatment and all found SFBT used fewer sessions than alternative therapies. Conclusion: The studies reviewed provide strong evidence that SFBT is an effective treatment for a wide variety of behavioral and psychological outcomes and, in addition, it may be briefer and therefore less costly than alternative approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049731512470859

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gingerich, W. J., & Peterson, L. T.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • St. Catherine University (US)
Corresponding author
Gingerich, Wallace J.
Venue
Research on Social Work Practice
Published
2013-01-27
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
266-283
ISSN
  • 1049-7315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7581
OpenAlex
W2103273040
Cited by
275
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9
FWCI
22.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Social Work Practice (publishedVersion)
  • UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
solution-focused therapy, psychotherapy effectiveness, depression treatment, brief psychotherapy, treatment duration, cost-effectiveness, psychological outcomes, behavioral effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review