Cited by 69Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effectiveness of a web-based solution-focused brief chat treatment for depressed adolescents and young adults: randomized controlled trial

Open access
Kramer, Jeannet, Conijn, Barbara, Oijevaar, Pien, Riper, Heleen·2014·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to 9% of young people suffer from depression. Unfortunately, many in need of help remain untreated. The Internet offers anonymous ways to help depressed youth, especially those who are reluctant to search for help because of fear of stigma. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of an individual chat treatment based on Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) to young individuals aged 12-22 years with depressive symptoms by comparing it to a waiting list control group. METHODS: For this study, 263 young people with depressive symptoms were randomized to the Web-based SFBT intervention, PratenOnline, or to a waiting list control condition. The chat treatment was delivered by trained professionals. Groups were compared on depressive complaints as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) after 9 weeks and 4.5 months. For the chat group only, changes in depressive symptoms at 7.5 months after baseline were explored. RESULTS: The experimental SFBT condition (n=131) showed significantly greater improvement than the waiting list condition (n=132) in depressive symptoms at 9 weeks and 4.5 months on the CES-D, with a small between group effect size at 9 weeks (d=0.18, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.47) and a large effect size at 4.5 months (d=0.79, 95% CI 0.45-1.08). The percentage of participants showing a reliable and clinically significant change in depression was significantly larger for the SFBT intervention at 4.5 months only (28.2% vs 11.4% for the waiting list, P<.001, number needed to treat=6). At 7.5 months, the SFBT group showed further improvements. However, results have to be considered carefully because of high attrition rates. CONCLUSIONS: The Web-based SFBT chat intervention of PratenOnline was more effective than a waiting list control group in reducing depressive symptoms, and effects were larger at follow-up then at post-treatment. More studies are needed to find out if outcomes will be replicated, especially for those younger than 18 year old. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register: NTR 1696; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=1696 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6DspeYWrJ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.3261

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher pre-test scores in depression, a longer history of mood disorders, or low scores in anxiety at pre-test predicted greater adherence.

    “Mental health also played a role, with higher pre-test scores in depression (57), a longer history of mood disorders (51), or low scores in anxiety at pre-test (70) predicting greater adherence.”

    From What Works and What Doesn’t Work? A Systematic Review of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Young People (2019) · cites this paper as [51]

    Citation (51) is attached to the longer-history claim. In Results > Attrition (page unavailable), participants with a longer history of mood problems were more likely to be non-completers of the first follow-up questionnaire—the opposite direction for questionnaire completion. The passage does not establish that a longer history predicted greater chat-treatment adherence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Gender was a consistent predictor of adherence, with females being more likely to complete compared to males.

    “Gender was also a consistent predictor of adherence, with females being more likely to complete compared to males (51, 57, 70).”

    From What Works and What Doesn’t Work? A Systematic Review of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Young People (2019) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Results > Attrition section (page unavailable) reports that males were more likely to miss the first follow-up questionnaire, supporting the direction of the completion difference. It does not establish gender as a consistent predictor across follow-ups or of adherence to the chat treatment; the later follow-up comparisons identify other factors. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Sundstrom SM Single-session psychotherapy for depression: Is it better to be problem-focused or solution-focused? 1993 Iowa State University - Thesis/Dissertation 1993 Ames, Iowa Iowa State University

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kramer, J., Conijn, B., Oijevaar, P., & Riper, H.
Affiliations
  • Trimbos Institute (NL)
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Kramer, Jeannet
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2014-05-29
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
e141
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138643659
Cited by
69
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ZonMw
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
adolescent depression, young adult depression, solution-focused therapy, online therapy, depressive symptoms, treatment effectiveness, attrition, help-seeking barriers, stigma, waitlist control, number needed to treat, follow-up outcomes, Germany
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Brief, Waiting Lists, Telemedicine, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review