The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity
Abstract
To increase the integrity and trustworthiness of qualitative research, researchers need to evaluate how intersubjective elements influence data collection and analysis. Reflexivity— where researchers engage in explicit, self-aware analysis of their own role—offers one tool for such evaluation. The process of engaging in reflexive analysis, however, is difficult, and its subjective, ambiguous nature is contested. In the face of challenges, researchers might retreat from engaging in the process. In this article, the author seeks to “out” the researcher’s presence by exploring the theory and practice of reflexivity. Examples from research illustrate its problematic potential.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Reflexivity is acknowledged as a crucial concept and is pivotal in the methodology of qualitative research.”
From Challenging perspectives: Reflexivity as a critical approach to qualitative social work research (2024) · cites this paper as Finlay, 2002
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, while reflexivity has become significant in the production of qualitative research, the necessary techniques may not be clear (Day, 2012), and it can be considered too subjective (Finlay, 2002) leading to questioning the validity of the research.”
From Challenging perspectives: Reflexivity as a critical approach to qualitative social work research (2024) · cites this paper as Finlay, 2002
In the citing paper
“Reflection entails a subject-object analysis or subject 'I' analysis as Finlay (2002) mentioned.”
From Challenging perspectives: Reflexivity as a critical approach to qualitative social work research (2024) · cites this paper as Finlay, 2002
In the citing paper
“As such, C.A.M. and S.E.O. continually examined their beliefs, assumptions and motivations, and how these affected their research.41”
From Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study (2021) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Phenomenological research methods
Moustakas, C. (1994) · doi:10.4135/9781412995658 · Cited by 13,919
Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age
Giddens, A. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003060963-59 · Cited by 13,399
Mead, G. H., Joas, H., Huebner, D. R., & Morris, C. W. (2015) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226112879.001.0001 · Cited by 12,419
Hepburn, R. W., Heidegger, M., Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E. (1927) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,201
Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy
van Manen, M. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,308
InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing
Flinders, D. J. (1997) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(97)89858-8 · Cited by 7,236
Handbook of Qualitative Research.
DeVault, M. L., Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076551 · Cited by 6,269
Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3618 · Cited by 5,667
The Quality of Qualitative Research
Seale, C. F. (1999) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9780857020093 · Cited by 2,174
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Coffey, A., 1996, Making sense of qualitative data analysis: Complementary strategies
- DeVault, M. L., 1997, Reflexivity and voice, 216
- Dilthey, W., 1985, Poetry and experience: Selected Works
- Ellis, C., 1997, Reflexivity and voice, 119
- Gough, B., International Human Science Conference
- Harré, R., 1983, Personal being
- Hertz, R., 1997, Reflexivity and voice
- Jorgenson, J., 1991, Research and reflexivity, 210
- Marshall, H., 1998, Standpoints and differences, 115
- Outhwaite, W., 1985, The returnof grand theory in the human sciences, 21
- Reason, P., 1988, Human inquiry in action
- Reinharz, S., 1997, Reflexivity and voice, 3
- Wasserfall, R. R., 1997, Reflexivity and voice, 150
- Wertz, F. J., 1984, Exploring the lived world: Readings in phenomenological psychology, 29
- Willot, S., 1998, Standpoints and differences, 174
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research
Berger, R. (2015) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794112468475 · Cited by 4,031
“Like Finlay (2000) stated ‘I had to guard against assuming that my participants and I shared the same language … if I failed to do so, I might have missed the point’ (p. 537).”
BackgroundChoose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory
Starks, H., & Brown Trinidad, S. (2007) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732307307031 · Cited by 2,528
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2022.2057287 · Cited by 2,014
“Qualitative methodologists have proposed various reflexivity typologies (Finlay 2002a; Walsh 2003; D’Cruz et al. 2005), though none have gained prominence within HPE or beyond.”
BackgroundInfluentialNegotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice
Finlay, L. (2002) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/146879410200200205 · Cited by 1,979
“We no longer seek to eradicate the researcher’s presence – instead subjectivity in research is transformed from a problem to an opportunity (Finlay, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMoltu, C., Stefansen, J., Svisdahl, M., & Veseth, M. (2012) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.656792 · Cited by 1,247
Metadata
- Authors
- Finlay, L.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Finlay, Linda
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 531-545
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- OpenAlex
- W2133094746
- Cited by
- 1,937
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 345 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 27.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Keywords
- reflexivity, researcher reflexivity, researcher presence, intersubjectivity, research trustworthiness, researcher positionality
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Health Services Research, Research Design, Research Personnel, Professional Role
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review