Cited by 98Health Sciences Research and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceNursing education and management

A Context of Uncertainty: How Context Shapes Nurses' Research Utilization Behaviors

Scott, Shannon D., Estabrooks, Carole A., Allen, Marion, Pollock, Carolee·2008·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

Context has often been cited as a significant factor in shaping research utilization behavior, yet scholars have been unable to provide specific detail as to how and why it is important. From an ethnographic study of research utilization in a pediatric intensive care unit, we determined that the primary characteristic of this nursing unit was uncertainty. We identified four major sources of uncertainty: (1) the precarious status of seriously ill patients, (2) the inherent unpredictability of nurses' work, (3) the complexity of teamwork in a highly sophisticated hospital environment, and (4) a changing management. We found that uncertainty shaped nurses' behaviors such that research use was irrelevant. Reducing uncertainty is a necessary precursor to any increase in research utilization by nurses. Future knowledge translation strategies need to begin by decreasing and managing uncertainty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732307313354

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few findings from biomedical research find their way into clinical application.

    “Despite these burgeoning body of relevant scientific knowledge emanating from biomedical research, only a few find their way into clinical application [9-11]; clinical problems are hardly translated into research projects [12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, S. D., Estabrooks, C. A., Allen, M., & Pollock, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • MacEwan University (CA)
Corresponding author
Scott, Shannon D.
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2008-03
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
347-357
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2165799193
Cited by
98
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
22.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
research utilization, nursing practice, uncertainty, context, pediatric intensive care unit, knowledge translation, teamwork, management change, seriously ill patients, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Clinical Nursing Research, Technology Transfer, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review