Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 418

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Writing Usable Qualitative Health Research Findings

Sandelowski, Margarete, Leeman, Jennifer·2012·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

Scholars in diverse health-related disciplines and specialty fields of practice routinely promote qualitative research as an essential component of intervention and implementation programs of research and of a comprehensive evidence base for practice. Remarkably little attention, however, has been paid to the most important element of qualitative studies—the findings in reports of those studies—and specifically to enhancing the accessibility and utilization value of these findings for diverse audiences of users. The findings in reports of qualitative health research are too often difficult to understand and even to find owing to the way they are presented. A basic strategy for enhancing the presentation of these findings is to translate them into thematic statements, which can then in turn be translated into the language of intervention and implementation. Writers of qualitative health research reports might consider these strategies better to showcase the significance and actionability of findings to a wider audience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732312450368

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1002/nur.20280 · DOI
  2. 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00213.x · DOI
  3. Bazerman C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01674.x · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00368.x · DOI
  6. 10.4278/0890-1171-16.6.331 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.10.001 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/1077800407311961 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.005 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1177/01939450022044467 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1023/A:1004234404801 · DOI
  13. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01724.x · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s12160-007-9008-5 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1177/1049732310377453 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s10464-009-9229-9 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/1077558707299887 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04207.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Leys M. (2003). Health technology assessment: The contribution of qualitative research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 19(2), 317-329. doi:10.1017.S026646230300028X10.1017.S026646230300028X · DOI
  22. 10.1080/09581590500372477 · DOI
  23. 10.1056/NEJMsa064637 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1177/1525822X04266831 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S1059-1311(03)00081-5 · DOI
  26. 10.1176/appi.ps.54.4.568 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1177/1049732309338719 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/rheumatology/kel022 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Pope C., Mays N., Popay J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
  32. Roberts E. V. (1995). Writing about literature (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  33. 10.1177/1525822X02239569 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1097/00001786-200410000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Samara T. (2007). Design elements: A graphic style manual. Gloucester, MA: Rockport.
  36. 10.1177/1558689809334210 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1002/nur.20080 · DOI
  38. Scott W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  39. 10.1001/jama.296.4.427 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Smaling A. (2003). Inductive analogical and communicative generalization. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2(1) Art. 5. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_1/pdf/smaling.pdf · DOI
  41. 10.4135/9781506335193.n28 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/030631283013002002 · DOI
  43. van Manen M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  44. 10.1177/1077558710372810 · DOI

Cited by

See all 418

Metadata

Authors
Sandelowski, M., & Leeman, J.
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2012-06-28
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1404-1413
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2116097182
Cited by
418
References
16
FWCI
104.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.