Cited by 953Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationPublic Health Policies and Education

Diffusion Theory and Knowledge Dissemination, Utilization, and Integration in Public Health

Green, Lawrence W., Ottoson, Judith M., García, César, Hiatt, Robert A.·2009·Annual Review of Public Health

Abstract

Legislators and their scientific beneficiaries express growing concerns that the fruits of their investment in health research are not reaching the public, policy makers, and practitioners with evidence-based practices. Practitioners and the public lament the lack of relevance and fit of evidence that reaches them and barriers to their implementation of it. Much has been written about this gap in medicine, much less in public health. We review the concepts that have guided or misguided public health in their attempts to bridge science and practice through dissemination and implementation. Beginning with diffusion theory, which inspired much of public health's work on dissemination, we compare diffusion, dissemination, and implementation with related notions that have served other fields in bridging science and practice. Finally, we suggest ways to blend diffusion with other theory and evidence in guiding a more decentralized approach to dissemination and implementation in public health, including changes in the ways we produce the science itself.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, L. W., Ottoson, J. M., García, C., & Hiatt, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • Central Washington University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Public Health
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
151-174
ISSN
  • 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2093
OpenAlex
W2169242778
Cited by
953
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 42
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks (Central Washington University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
diffusion theory, knowledge dissemination, evidence use, evidence-based practice, implementation research, research-practice gap, public health research, research translation, research output
MeSH terms
Community Health Services, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Policy, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Social Support, United States, Public Health Practice, Knowledge, Information Dissemination, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review