Cited by 147Health Policy Implementation SciencePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

Designing for diffusion: How can we increase uptake of cancer communication innovations?

Open access
Dearing, James W., Kreuter, Matthew W.·2010·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective The best innovations in cancer communication do not necessarily achieve uptake by researchers, public health and clinical practitioners, and policy makers. This paper describes design activities that can be applied and combined for the purpose of spreading effective cancer communication innovations.Methods A previously developed Push-Pull-Infrastructure Model is used to organize and highlight the types of activities that can be deployed during the design phase of innovations. Scientific literature about the diffusion of innovations, knowledge utilization, marketing, public health, and our experiences in working to spread effective practices, programs, and policies are used for this purpose.Results Attempts to broaden the reach, quicken the uptake, and facilitate the use of cancer communication innovations can apply design activities to increase the likelihood of diffusion. Some simple design activities hold considerable promise for improving dissemination and subsequent diffusion.Conclusion Augmenting current dissemination practices with evidence-based concepts from diffusion science, marketing science, and knowledge utilization hold promise for improving results by eliciting greater market pull.Practice implications Inventors and change agencies seeking to spread cancer communication innovations can experience more success by explicit consideration of design activities that reflect an expanded version of the Push-Pull-Infrastructure Model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.013

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]National Cancer Institute, Center for Advance of Health, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Designing for Dissemination Conference Summary Report 2002
  2. [13]Robinson B NCI plans to expand outreach through community-ased research programs NCI Cancer Bulletin 2009 6 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dearing, J. W., & Kreuter, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Dearing, James W.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
81
Pages
S100-S110
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053916417
Cited by
147
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (CA P50 95815, CA-P20-137219, P20CA137219, P50CA095815)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
cancer communication, diffusion of innovations, dissemination, knowledge application, marketing science, design activity, change agency
MeSH terms
Communication, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Services Research, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Neoplasms, Evidence-Based Medicine, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review