The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethical Challenges in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research (CBPR) are of increasing interest to researchers; however, it is not known how widespread these challenges are or how extensively the topic has been explored. Using Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review method, studies on ethical challenges in CBPR were mapped. Findings indicate that researchers continue to raise questions about ethics associated with CBPR. Our purpose in this article is to present a thematic summary of international ethical challenges as a guide for researchers interested in community participatory approaches and to better prepare them for qualitative health research with communities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many health and development organisations (such as Social Velocity 56 ) have frameworks to help design a theory of change.”
From Participatory action research (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 · Cited by 36,742
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1993) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,625
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 · Cited by 15,268
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x · Cited by 10,817
(2011) · Cited by 7,157
Action Research and Minority Problems
Lewin, K. (1946) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x · Cited by 6,554
A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency
Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1123 · Cited by 3,078
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. M. (2006) · Cited by 2,381
Methods For Community - Based Participatory Research For Health
Israel, B. A., & Satcher, D. S. (2013) · Cited by 2,128
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx Health Link, & Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (2012). Community IRBs and research review boards: Shaping the future of community-engaged research.
- Blake M. K., 2007, ACME, 6, 411
- Cahill C., 2007, ACME, 6, 360
- Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2014). CASP Checklists. Oxford, UK: Author. Retrieved from http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_29c5b002d99342f788c6ac670e49f274.pdf
- Flicker S., 2012, Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne de Sante Publique, 103, 19
- Freire P., 1970, Pedagogy of the oppressed
- Habermas J., 1974, Theory and practice
- Israel B. A., 2005, Methods in community-based participatory research for health
- Israel B. A., 2005, Methods for community-based participatory research for health
- Jamshidi E., 2014, International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 5, 1328
- 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301605 · DOI
- Walsh C. A., 2008, Qualitative Report, 13, 379
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A., & Hodgetts, D. (2023) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1 · Cited by 743
Panel, S. G. P. C., Hoekstra, F., Mrklas, K., Khan, M., McKay, R. C., Vis‐Dunbar, M., Sibley, K. M., Nguyen, T., Graham, I. D., & Gainforth, H. L. (2020) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9 · Cited by 365
Ortiz, K. S., Nash, J. L., Shea, L., OETZEL, J. G., Garoutte, J., Sanchez‐Youngman, S., & Wallerstein, N. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220 · Cited by 224
Participatory Research Approaches with Youth: Ethics, Engagement, and Meaningful Action
Teixeira, S., Augsberger, A., Richards‐Schuster, K., & Sprague Martinez, L. (2021) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12501 · Cited by 112
Groot, B. C., Vink, M., Haveman, A., Huberts, M., Schout, G., & Abma, T. (2018) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1450771 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, E., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Elena
- ORCID
- Kenny, Amanda
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-02-21
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-199
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- OpenAlex
- W2589287067
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Keywords
- community-based participatory research, research ethics, ethical considerations, community participation
- MeSH terms
- Confidentiality, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Power, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Qualitative Research, Internationality, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
