The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rewriting the Discovery of Grounded Theory after 25 Years?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Bazerman, C., 1988, Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science
- 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/256496 · DOI
- Glaser, B. G., 1978, Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory
- Glaser, B. G., 1992, Basics of grounded theory analysis
- Glaser, B. G., 1964, American Journal of Nursing, 64, 119
- Glaser, B. G., 1965, Awareness of dying
- 10.1086/223992 · DOI
- Glaser, B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory
- 10.2307/255857 · DOI
- Knorr-Cetina, K., 1981, The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science
- 10.1177/002188638602200207 · DOI · Paper page
- McCloskey, D., 1985, The rhetoric of economics
- Miles, M., 1984, Qualitative data analysis
- Mintzberg, H., 1984, Method and analysis in organizational research
- Selzer, J., 1993, Understanding scientific prose
- Stem, P. N., 1994, Critical Issues in qualitative research methods
- Stinchcombe, A. L., 1982, American Sociologist, 17, 2
- Strauss, A. L., 1990, Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques
- 10.2307/2392097 · DOI
- Turner, B. A., 1978, Man-made disasters
- 10.1007/BF00164639 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00211.x · DOI
- Yin, R., 1981, Case study research
Cited by
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not
Suddaby, R. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020 · Cited by 2,859
Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective
Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0103 · Cited by 1,071
Goulding, C. (2005) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560510581782 · Cited by 944
Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn
Clarke, A. E. (2003) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553 · Cited by 892
Metadata
- Authors
- Locke, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Inquiry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239-245
- ISSN
- 1056-4926 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6542
- OpenAlex
- W1975608116
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rewriting the Discovery of Grounded Theory after 25 Years? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/105649269653008
- The paper
- Locke, K. (1996). Rewriting the Discovery of Grounded Theory after 25 Years? Journal of Management Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/105649269653008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
