Cited by 5Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyHealthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Provider and Patient Determinants of Generic Levothyroxine Prescribing: An Electronic Health Records–Based Study

Open access
Romanelli, Robert J., Nimbal, Vani, Dutcher, Sarah K., Pu, Xia, Segal, Jodi B.·2017·Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of generic levothyroxine products for more than a decade, uptake of these products is poor. Objective: We sought to evaluate determinants of generic prescribing of levothyroxine. Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis of electronic health records data between 2010 and 2013, we identified adult patients with a levothyroxine prescription from a primary-care physician (PCP) or endocrinologist. We used mixed-effect logistic regression models with random intercepts for prescribing provider to examine predictors of generic levothyroxine prescribing. Models include patient, prescription, and provider fixed-effect covariates. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were generated. Between-provider random variation was quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Study patients (n = 63 838) were clustered among 941 prescribing providers within 25 ambulatory care clinics. The overall prevalence of generic prescribing of levothyroxine was 73%. In the multivariable mixed-effect model, patients were significantly less likely to receive generic levothyroxine from an endocrinologist than a PCP (OR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.33-0.55; P < 0.001). Women were less likely to receive generic levothyroxine than men from endocrinologists (OR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.59-0.78; P < 0.001) but not from PCPs. Between-provider variation in generic prescribing was 18.3% in the absence of fixed-effect covariates and could be explained marginally by patient, prescription, and provider factors (ICC = 15.9%). Conclusions: Generic levothyroxine prescribing differed by PCPs and endocrinologists. Residual variation in generic prescribing, after accounting for measurable factors, indicates the need for provider interventions or patient education aimed at improving levothyroxine generic uptake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1060028017705393

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]US Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Prescription drug products; levothyroxine sodium. Fed Regist. 1997; 63: 43535– 43538.
  2. [10]Generic Pharmaceutical Association. Generic drug savings in the U.S. Seventh annual edition: 2015. http://www.gphaon-ine.org/media/wysiwyg/PDF/GPhA_Savings_Report_2015.pdf Accessed February 13, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romanelli, R. J., Nimbal, V., Dutcher, S. K., Pu, X., & Segal, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Palo Alto Medical Foundation (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Romanelli, Robert J.
Venue
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Published
2017-04-20
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
640-648
ISSN
  • 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1060-0280
  • 1542-6270
OpenAlex
W2605743687
Cited by
5
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1U01FD005267-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
levothyroxine, generic prescribing, prescribing determinants, endocrinologists, primary care physicians, sex differences in prescribing, thyroid hormone replacement, patient education
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Drug Prescriptions, Random Allocation, Thyroxine, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Drugs, Generic, Electronic Health Records, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review