The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption
Open accessAbstract
Comparative studies of corruption focus on the selection and incentives of policymakers. With few exceptions, actors who are in charge of implementing policies have been neglected. This article analyzes an original data set on the bureaucratic features and its effects on corruption in fifty-two countries. Two empirical findings challenge the conventional wisdom in literature. First, certain bureaucratic factors, particularly meritocratic recruitment, reduce corruption, even when controlling for a large set of alternative explanations. Second, the analysis shows that other allegedly relevant bureaucratic factors, such as public employees’ competitive salaries, career stability, or internal promotion, do not have a significant impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization
Wade, R. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9780691187181 · Cited by 4,835
Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies
Aberbach, J. D., Putnam, R. D., & Rockman, B. A. (1981) · doi:10.4159/9780674020047 · Cited by 1,157
Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe
Ertman, T. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529016 · Cited by 988
Cited by
Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020
OECD (2020) · Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean · doi:10.1787/13130fbb-en · Cited by 481
Democracy and Bureaucracy: How their Quality Matters for Popular Satisfaction
Dahlberg, S., & Holmberg, S. (2014) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.830468 · Cited by 408
Bureaucracy and Service Delivery
Pepinsky, T. B., Pierskalla, J. H., & Sacks, A. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022705 · Cited by 258
Rothstein, B. (2015) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12128 · Cited by 132
Defining Bureaucratic Autonomy
Bersch, K., & Fukuyama, F. (2023) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102914 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V., & Teorell, J.
- Venue
- Political Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-06-16
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 656-668
- ISSN
- 1065-9129 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1981932895
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 47.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1065912911408109
- The paper
- Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V., & Teorell, J. (2012). The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption. Political Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911408109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.