Cited by 94

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationships Among Measures of Career Self-Efficacy, Generalized Self-Efficacy, and Global Self-Esteem

Betz, Nancy E., Klein, Karla L.·1996·Journal of Career Assessment

Abstract

This study involved the examination of relationships among behavior-domain-specific measures of career self-efficacy and measures of generalized self-efficacy and global self-esteem. Correlations of domain-specific measures were higher with generalized self-efficacy than with global self-esteem and were higher, in some cases significantly so, for male than for female students. The domains most strongly correlated with generalized self-efficacy were career decision-making self-efficacy in both sexes and several of the Holland (1973, 1985) theme self-efficacy measures in men.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/106907279600400304

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bandura, A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action
  3. Betz, N.E., Manual for the Skills Confidence Inventory
  4. 10.1037/0022-0167.28.5.399 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0001-8791(83)90046-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.90 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/106907279600400103 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01826.x · DOI
  9. Crites, J.O., 1978, Career Maturity Inventory
  10. Crites, J.O., 1978, Career Maturity Inventory: Theory and research handbook
  11. Glass, G.V., 1984, Statistical methods in psychology and education
  12. Hackett, G. & Lent, R.W. (1992). Theoretical advances and current inquiry in counseling psychology. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent, Jr. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (2nd ed., pp. 419-452). New York: Wiley.
  13. Harshbarger, J., 1991, An exploration of the relationship between self-esteem and unconditional regard from significant others
  14. Hathaway, S.R., 1967, Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
  15. Holland, J.L., 1973, Making vocational choices: A theory of careers
  16. Holland, J.L., 1985, Making vocational choices
  17. Holland, J.L., 1980, My Vocational Situation
  18. Layton, P.L., 1984, Self-efficacy, locus of control, career salience, and women's career choice
  19. 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1994.tb00514.x · DOI
  20. 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1037/0022-0167.31.3.356 · DOI
  22. 10.1006/jvbe.1993.1016 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0022-0167.40.2.194 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Osipow, S.H., 1987, Career Decision Scale
  26. 10.1177/106907279300100103 · DOI
  27. Robinson, J.P., 1991, Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes
  28. Rogers, C., 1961, On becoming a person
  29. 10.1016/0001-8791(92)90044-Z · DOI
  30. 10.1515/9781400876136 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3.899 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/106907279400200202 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0001-8791(83)90006-4 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0001-8791(90)90004-L · DOI · Paper page
  35. Zilber, S.M., 1988, The effects of sex, task performance, and attributional styles on task and career self-efficacy expectations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 94

Metadata

Authors
Betz, N. E., & Klein, K. L.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University
Venue
Journal of Career Assessment
Published
1996-06
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
285-298
ISSN
  • 1069-0727
  • 1552-4590
Cited by
94
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review