Cited by 535Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversitySchool Choice and Performance

The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy: Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies.

Open access
Marsh, Herbert W., Pekrun, Reinhard, Parker, Philip D., Murayama, Kou, Guo, Jiesi, Dicke, Theresa, Arens, A. Katrin·2019·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

This study extends the classic constructive dialogue/debate between self-concept and self-efficacy researchers (Marsh, Roche, Pajares & Miller, 1997) regarding the distinctions between these two constructs. The study is a substantive-methodological synergy, bringing together new substantive, theoretical and statistical models, and developing new tests of the classic jingle-jangle fallacy. We demonstrate that in a representative sample of 3,350 students from math classes in 43 German schools, generalized math self-efficacy and math outcome expectancies were indistinguishable from math self-concept, but were distinct from test-related and functional measures of self-efficacy. This is consistent with the jingle-jangle fallacies that are proposed. On the basis of pre-test-variables, we demonstrate negative frame-of-reference effects in social (big-fish-little-pond effect) and dimensional (internal/external frame-of-reference effect) comparisons for three self-concept-like constructs in each of the first four years of secondary school. In contrast, none of the frame-of-reference effects were significantly negative for either of the two self-efficacy-like constructs in any of the four years of testing. After controlling for pre-test variables, each of the three self-concept-like constructs (math self-concept, outcome expectancy, and generalized math self-efficacy) in each of the four years of secondary school was more strongly related to post-test outcomes (school grades, test scores, future aspirations) than were the corresponding two self-efficacy-like factors. Extending discussion by Marsh et al. (1997) we clarify distinctions between self-efficacy and self-concept; the role of evaluation, worthiness, and outcome expectancy in self-efficacy measures; and complications in generalized and global measures of self-efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/edu0000281

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [10]10. Bong, M. (1996). Problems in academic motivation research and advantages and disadvantages of their solutions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 149-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0013http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0013 · DOI
  2. [45]45. Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. S. (1944). Level of aspiration. In J. M. Hunt, Personality and the behavior disorders (pp. 333-378). Oxford, England: Ronald Press.
  3. [53]53. Marsh, H. W. (1995). The analysis of multitrait multimethod data. In T. H. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd edition). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  4. [55]55. Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J., Abdelfattah, F., & Nagengast, B. (2014). The big-fish-little-pond effect in mathematics: A cross-cultural comparison of U. S. and Saudi Arabian TIMSS responses. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(5), 777-804.
  5. [67]67. Marsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D. & Seaton, M. (2014). Big-fish-little-pond social comparison and local dominance effects: Integrating new statistical models, methodology, design, theory and substantive implications. Learning and Instruction, 33, 50-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.002 · DOI
  6. [70]70. Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., Yeung, A. S. & Craven, R. C. (2017). Competence self-perceptions. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.). Handbook of Competence and Motivation: Theory and Application (2 nd Ed, pp. 85-115). New York: Guilford Press.
  7. [75]75. Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O'Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008- 9075-6 · DOI
  8. [76]76. Marsh, H. W., & Seaton, M. (2015). The big-fish-little-pond effect, competence self-perceptions, and relativity: Substantive advances and methodological innovation. In A. J. Elliott (Ed.). Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 127-184). New York Elsevier.
  9. [95]95. In R. Gilman, E. S. Huebner, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 149-160). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  10. [105]105. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence Perceptions and Academic Functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85-104). New York: Guilford Publications.
  11. [106]106. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37).
  12. [108]108. Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research, 46, 137-149. DOI: 10.1080/0013188042000222421421 · DOI
  13. [117]117. vom Hofe, R., Kleine, M., Blum, W., & Pekrun, R. (2005). On the role of "Grundvorstellungen" for the development of mathematical literacy: First results of the longitudinal study PALMA. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 67-84.
  14. [122]122. Wylie, R. C. (1989). Measures of self-concept. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  15. [129]129. Jöreskog, K. G. (1979). Statistical estimation of structural models in longitudinal investigations. In J. R. Nesselroade & B. Baltes (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development (pp. 303-351). New York: Academic Press.
  16. [131]131. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K-T. (1998). Is parsimony always desirable: Response to Hoyle, Sivo & Willson, Markus, Mulaik, Tweedledee, Tweedledum, the Cheshire Cat, and others. Journal of Experimental Education, 66(3), 274-285.
  17. [133]133. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K-T & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary Psychometrics. A Festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275-340). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
  18. [137]137. Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Technical aspects of Muthén's LISCOMP approach to estimation of latent variable relations with a comprehensive measurement model. Psychometrika, 60(4), 489-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2019-02
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
331-353
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2805764211
Cited by
535
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 6
FWCI
38.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) (submittedVersion)
  • peDOCS
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DP130102713)
  • German Research Foundation (PE 320/11-1; PE 320/11-2; PE 320/11-3; PE 320/11-4)
  • Japan Society of Promoting Science (16H06406)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
self-concept, self-efficacy, mathematics self-efficacy, big-fish-little-pond effect, evaluation, worthiness, general self-efficacy, high school students, academic performance, future aspirations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review