Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 139

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Mating System of Foragers in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample

Marlowe, Frank W.·2003·Cross-Cultural Research

Abstract

Among foragers, men's foods are often shared widely outside the household, undercutting variation in the benefit their wives and children receive. This means polygyny may not be due to variation in household provisioning. Some have even suggested that bonds in general, whether polygynous or monogamous, may have less to do with male provisioning than male-male contest competition. However, an analysis of foragers in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample reveals that male provisioning does affect the mating system. Societies with higher male contribution to subsistence are more monogamous. The author argues that women value male provisioning less where males bring in less food, which results in greater polygyny. Where it is difficult for women to acquire food, they value male provisioning more, forcing males to compete via food acquisition. Food sharing prevents the polygyny threshold from being reached but does not completely erase the benefit of pair bonding with a good forager.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1069397103254008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. · DOI
  2. 10.2307/3773338 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/3773435 · DOI
  4. Blurton Jones, N. G., Marlowe, F., Hawkes, K. & O'Connell, J. (2000). Paternal investment and hunter-gatherer divorce rates. In W. Irons (Ed.), Adaptation and human behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 69-90). New York: Elsevier. · DOI
  5. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Is the polygyny threshold model relevant to humans? Kipsigis evidence. In C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor & A. J. Boyce (Eds.), Mating patterns (pp. 209-230). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. 10.1098/rspb.1989.0027 · DOI
  7. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. · DOI
  8. Ellison, P. T. (2001). On fertile ground. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. 10.1177/106939719202600108 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/106939717901400102 · DOI
  11. Ember, M. & Ember, C. R. (1983). Marriage, family, and kinship: Comparative studies of social organization. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.
  12. Goodale, J. C. (1971). Tiwi wives: A study of the women of Melville Island, North Australia. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  13. Gowaty, P. A. (1996). Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In J. M. Black (Ed.), Partnerships in birds: The study of monogamy (pp. 21-52). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0162-3095(96)00003-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.7123238 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1086/202775 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00066-0 · DOI
  18. 10.1086/322559 · DOI
  19. Hill, G. W. (1956). The Warao of the Amacuro Delta (EHRAF edition, Vol. 2001). Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.
  20. 10.1086/203251 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:4<156::AID-EVAN5>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  22. Kelly, R. L. (1995). The foraging spectrum. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
  23. Kleiman, D. G. & Malcolm, J. R. (1981). The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In D. J. Gubernick & P. H. Klopfer (Eds.), Parental care in mammals (pp. 347-387). New York: Plenum. · DOI
  24. Lancaster, J. B. & Lancaster, C. S. (1983). Parental investment: The hominid adaptation. In D. Ortner (Ed.), How humans evolve (pp. 33-58). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
  25. Layrisse, M. (1980). Vital statistics of five Warao sub-tribes (EHRAF edition, Vol. 2001). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Latin America Center Publications.
  26. Lee, R. B. (1968). What hunters do for a living or how to make out on scarce resources. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Man the hunter (pp. 30-48). Chicago: Aldine. · DOI
  27. 10.1126/science.211.4480.341 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1086/203627 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/icb/30.2.325 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00118-2 · DOI
  31. 10.1086/323820 · DOI
  32. Mesnick, S. L. (1997). Sexual alliances: Evidence and evolutionary implications. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 207-257). New York: Chapman and Hall. · DOI
  33. Murdock, G. P. (1967). The ethnographic atlas: A summary. Ethnology, 6. · DOI
  34. Murdock, G. P. & Morrow, D. O. (1980). Subsistence economy and supportive practices: Cross-cultural codes 1. In H. Barry & A. Schlegel (Eds.), Cross-cultural samples and codes (pp. 45-73). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
  35. Murdock, G. P. & White, D. R. (1980). Standard cross-cultural sample. In H. Barry & A. Schlegel (Eds.), Cross-cultural samples and codes (pp. 3-43). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  36. 10.1525/aa.1993.95.4.02a00050 · DOI
  37. Ryan, M. J. (1997). Sexual selection and mate choice. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 179-202). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  38. Sanday, P. R. (1973). Toward a theory of the status of women. American Anthropologist, 75, 682-700. · DOI
  39. 10.1086/204657 · DOI
  40. 10.2307/1935753 · DOI
  41. Whitten, P. L. (1987). Infants and adult males. In B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 343-357). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

See all 139

Metadata

Authors
Marlowe, F. W.
Venue
Cross-Cultural Research
Published
2003-08
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
282-306
ISSN
  • 1069-3971
  • 1552-3578
Cited by
139
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review