The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mating System of Foragers in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample
Abstract
Among foragers, men's foods are often shared widely outside the household, undercutting variation in the benefit their wives and children receive. This means polygyny may not be due to variation in household provisioning. Some have even suggested that bonds in general, whether polygynous or monogamous, may have less to do with male provisioning than male-male contest competition. However, an analysis of foragers in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample reveals that male provisioning does affect the mating system. Societies with higher male contribution to subsistence are more monogamous. The author argues that women value male provisioning less where males bring in less food, which results in greater polygyny. Where it is difficult for women to acquire food, they value male provisioning more, forcing males to compete via food acquisition. Food sharing prevents the polygyny threshold from being reached but does not completely erase the benefit of pair bonding with a good forager.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Second, a reproductive ratio of 1:17 falls far outside ratios typical in ethnographic data36.”
From Cultural hitchhiking and competition between patrilineal kin groups explain the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2018) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals
Orians, G. H. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282628 · Cited by 1,511
Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences
Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7 · Cited by 521 · cited 1×
“Among all 186 societies in the SCCS, there is a higher degree of polygyny where there is a higher pathogen stress (Low, 1990), and one study of 29 cultures found more emphasis on looks in mate preferences where pathogen stress is higher (Gangestad & Buss, 1993).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. · DOI
- 10.2307/3773338 · DOI
- 10.2307/3773435 · DOI
- Blurton Jones, N. G., Marlowe, F., Hawkes, K. & O'Connell, J. (2000). Paternal investment and hunter-gatherer divorce rates. In W. Irons (Ed.), Adaptation and human behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 69-90). New York: Elsevier. · DOI
- Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Is the polygyny threshold model relevant to humans? Kipsigis evidence. In C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor & A. J. Boyce (Eds.), Mating patterns (pp. 209-230). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- 10.1098/rspb.1989.0027 · DOI
- Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. · DOI
- Ellison, P. T. (2001). On fertile ground. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- 10.1177/106939719202600108 · DOI
- 10.1177/106939717901400102 · DOI
- Ember, M. & Ember, C. R. (1983). Marriage, family, and kinship: Comparative studies of social organization. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.
- Goodale, J. C. (1971). Tiwi wives: A study of the women of Melville Island, North Australia. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
- Gowaty, P. A. (1996). Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In J. M. Black (Ed.), Partnerships in birds: The study of monogamy (pp. 21-52). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 10.1016/0162-3095(96)00003-9 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.7123238 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/202775 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00066-0 · DOI
- 10.1086/322559 · DOI
- Hill, G. W. (1956). The Warao of the Amacuro Delta (EHRAF edition, Vol. 2001). Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.
- 10.1086/203251 · DOI
- 10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:4<156::AID-EVAN5>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
- Kelly, R. L. (1995). The foraging spectrum. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
- Kleiman, D. G. & Malcolm, J. R. (1981). The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In D. J. Gubernick & P. H. Klopfer (Eds.), Parental care in mammals (pp. 347-387). New York: Plenum. · DOI
- Lancaster, J. B. & Lancaster, C. S. (1983). Parental investment: The hominid adaptation. In D. Ortner (Ed.), How humans evolve (pp. 33-58). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
- Layrisse, M. (1980). Vital statistics of five Warao sub-tribes (EHRAF edition, Vol. 2001). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Latin America Center Publications.
- Lee, R. B. (1968). What hunters do for a living or how to make out on scarce resources. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Man the hunter (pp. 30-48). Chicago: Aldine. · DOI
- 10.1126/science.211.4480.341 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/203627 · DOI
- 10.1093/icb/30.2.325 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00118-2 · DOI
- 10.1086/323820 · DOI
- Mesnick, S. L. (1997). Sexual alliances: Evidence and evolutionary implications. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 207-257). New York: Chapman and Hall. · DOI
- Murdock, G. P. (1967). The ethnographic atlas: A summary. Ethnology, 6. · DOI
- Murdock, G. P. & Morrow, D. O. (1980). Subsistence economy and supportive practices: Cross-cultural codes 1. In H. Barry & A. Schlegel (Eds.), Cross-cultural samples and codes (pp. 45-73). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
- Murdock, G. P. & White, D. R. (1980). Standard cross-cultural sample. In H. Barry & A. Schlegel (Eds.), Cross-cultural samples and codes (pp. 3-43). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- 10.1525/aa.1993.95.4.02a00050 · DOI
- Ryan, M. J. (1997). Sexual selection and mate choice. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 179-202). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
- Sanday, P. R. (1973). Toward a theory of the status of women. American Anthropologist, 75, 682-700. · DOI
- 10.1086/204657 · DOI
- 10.2307/1935753 · DOI
- Whitten, P. L. (1987). Infants and adult males. In B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 343-357). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cited by
Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168 · Cited by 1,391
The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity
Del Giudice, M., Ellis, B. J., & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.11.007 · Cited by 1,373
Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: an integrated life history approach
Ellis, B. J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.920 · Cited by 1,014
Hunter-gatherers and human evolution.
Marlowe, F. W. (2005) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20046 · Cited by 944
Self-citationBiosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7 · Cited by 770
Metadata
- Authors
- Marlowe, F. W.
- Venue
- Cross-Cultural Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 282-306
- ISSN
- 1069-3971
- 1552-3578
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review