Cited by 49Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMind wandering and attentionHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Reliability and validity of the online continuous performance test among young adults

Raz, Sivan, Bar-Haim, Yair, Sadeh, Avi, Dan, Orrie·2014·Assessment

Abstract

Continuous Performance Tests (CPTs) are used in research and clinical contexts to measure sustained attention and response inhibition. Reliability and validity of a new Online Continuous Performance Test (OCPT) was assessed. The OCPT is designed for delivery over the Internet, thereby opening new opportunities for research and clinical application in naturalistic settings. In Study 1, participants completed the OCPT twice over a 1-week period. One test was taken at home and one in the laboratory. Construct validity was assessed against a gold standard CPT measure. Results indicate acceptable reliability between the home- and laboratory-administered tests. Modest to high correlations were observed between the OCPT scales and the corresponding scales of the gold standard CPT. Study 2 examined whether the OCPT may discriminate participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder from healthy controls. Results revealed significantly higher rates of omission and commission errors and greater response time variability in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder relative to healthy controls. These results support the reliability and validity of the OCPT and suggest that it may serve as an effective tool for the assessment of attention function in naturalistic settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191112443409

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raz, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Sadeh, A., & Dan, O.
Affiliations
  • The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College (IL)
  • Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Assessment
Published
2012-04-18
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
108-118
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2102258868
Cited by
49
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
sustained attention, response inhibition, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, online assessment, construct validity, test-retest reliability, naturalistic assessment, omission and commission errors, reaction time variability, young adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Social Environment, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review