Cited by 165Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A Review of the Validity of Laboratory Cognitive Tasks Used to Assess Symptoms of ADHD

Nichols, Shana L., Waschbusch, Daniel A.·2004·Child Psychiatry and Human Development

Abstract

Reviewed the validity of frequently used laboratory assessment measures of ADHD symptoms using research published since 1991. Emphasized examining the validity of the tasks as they are commonly used by clinicians and researchers. Tasks evaluated included the Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and the Gordon Diagnostic System (GDS), the Children's Checking Task (CCT), Delay of Gratification Tasks, the Choice-Delay Task, (C-DT), and the Stop Signal Task (SST). Results showed that the CPT, C-DT, and the SST had the most support, yet further efforts to evaluate the validity of these measures are needed before they can be used for more than experimental purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:chud.0000020681.06865.97

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with ADHD tend to make more errors of false rejection and false alarm than children without ADHD.

    “Children with ADHD tend to make more errors of false rejection (i.e., not pressing a key when they are supposed to do so) and false alarm (i.e., pressing a key when they are not supposed to do so) than children without ADHD (Nichols & Waschbusch, 2004).”

    From Implementation Intentions Facilitate Response Inhibition in Children with ADHD (2008) · cites this paper as Nichols & Waschbusch, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nichols, S. L., & Waschbusch, D. A.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Waschbusch, Daniel A.
Venue
Child Psychiatry and Human Development
Published
2004-06
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
297-315
ISSN
  • 0009-398X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3327
OpenAlex
W2018817659
Cited by
165
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, validity, continuous performance test, delay of gratification, stop-signal task, impulsivity, executive function
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review