CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 107Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Utility of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS)

Stasik-O’Brien, Sara M., Brock, Rebecca L., Chmielewski, Michael, Naragon-Gainey, Kristin, Koffel, Erin, McDade-Montez, Elizabeth, O’Hara, Michael W., Watson, David·2019·Assessment
DOI 10.1177/1073191118790036
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Depressive and anxiety disorders are severe and disabling conditions that result in substantial cost and global societal burden. Accurate and efficient identification is thus vital to proper diagnosis and treatment of these disorders. The Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) is a reliable and well-validated measure that provides dimensional assessment of both mood and anxiety disorder symptoms. The current study examined the clinical utility of the IDAS by establishing diagnostic cutoff scores and severity ranges using a large mixed sample (N = 5,750). Results indicated that the IDAS scales are good to excellent predictors of their associated Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV diagnoses. These findings were replicated using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria assessed via the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. We provide three cutoff scores for each scale that can be used differentially depending on the goal of their use: screening, efficiency, or diagnosis confirmation. The identified severity ranges allow users to characterize individuals as mild, moderate, or severe, providing clinical information beyond diagnostic status. Finally, the 10-item IDAS Dysphoria scale and 20-item General Depression scale demonstrate strong ability to predict internalizing diagnoses and may represent an efficient way to screen for the presence of internalizing psychopathology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191118790036

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Beck A. T., 1990, Beck Anxiety Inventory manual
  2. Beck A. T., 1996, Beck Depression Inventory manual
  3. Butcher J. N., 1989, The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring
  4. 10.1037//1040-3590.6.4.284 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Clark L. A., 2014, Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality–2nd edition (SNAP-2): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation
  6. First M. B., 2002, Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, Research version, Patient edition (SCID-I/P)
  7. First M. B., 2015, Structured clinical interview for DSM-5
  8. Kotwicki R., 2013, Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 10, 14
  9. Reynolds W. M., 2002, Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale professional manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stasik-O’Brien, S. M., Brock, R. L., Chmielewski, M., Naragon-Gainey, K., Koffel, E., McDade-Montez, E., O’Hara, M. W., & Watson, D.
Affiliations
  • Knox College (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
  • The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
  • Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
  • ETR Associates, Scotts Valley, CA, USA
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Stasik-O’Brien, Sara M.
ORCID
Venue
Assessment
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2018-07-25
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
944-960
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
DOI
10.1177/1073191118790036
OpenAlex
W2884815064
Cited by
106
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH068472)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
depression, anxiety disorders, diagnostic thresholds, screening, internalizing psychopathology, dysphoria, depression severity, DSM-IV, DSM-5
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review