Cited by 50Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Welfare and Adoption

Risk Reduction for Substance Use and Trauma-Related Psychopathology in Adolescent Sexual Assault Victims: Findings From an Open Trial

Open access
Kmett Danielson, Carla, McCart, Michael R., de Arellano, Michael A., Macdonald, Alexandra, Doherty, Lauren S., Resnick, Heidi S.·2010·Child Maltreatment

Abstract

Limited attention has been paid to the development and evaluation of interventions that reduce risk for substance use, while also targeting trauma-related psychopathology among maltreated adolescents. Risk Reduction through Family Therapy (RRFT) is a multicomponent treatment that integrates principles and interventions from existing empirically supported treatments. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementation and initial efficacy of RRFT through an open pilot trial involving a small sample (N = 10) of female adolescents (aged 13—17 years) who had experienced at least one memorable sexual assault in their lifetime. Measures of substance use and substance use risk factors (e.g., family functioning), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression symptoms were assessed pre- and posttreatment as well as at 3-month and 6-month posttreatment follow-up assessments. Results demonstrated reductions in multiple areas, including substance use and related risk factors, PTSD, and depression symptoms, which were maintained through follow-up. Clinical implications and future directions with this line of research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077559510367939

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the RRFT pilot with 10 participants, treatment satisfaction was high and outcomes for substance use, PTSD, depression, and ecological functioning were promising, while family functioning outcomes were modest; formal significance testing was not used because of the small sample, and overall study quality was weak.

    “In the pilot (n=10), participants had high levels of treatment satisfaction, and promising outcomes for substance use, PTSD, depression, and ecological functioning, although family functioning outcomes were modest; the authors did not use formal significance testing due to the small sample size (weak overall study quality) [50].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Moos R Moos B FES Manual 1986 2nd ed. Palo Alto, CA Consulting Psychologists Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kmett Danielson, C., McCart, M. R., de Arellano, M. A., Macdonald, A., Doherty, L. S., & Resnick, H. S.
Affiliations
  • National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA,
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
Venue
Child Maltreatment
Published
2010-06-08
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
261-268
ISSN
  • 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6119
OpenAlex
W2090741384
Cited by
50
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-K23-DA018686, K23DA018686)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
adolescent sexual assault, substance use, trauma-related psychopathology, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, family therapy, risk mitigation, family functioning, adolescent girls, treatment feasibility, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child Abuse, Sexual, Depressive Disorder, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review