CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131Health Policy Implementation ScienceChild Welfare and AdoptionSocial Work Education and Practice

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of an Evidence-Based Parenting Intervention to Prevent Child Maltreatment: The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program

Shapiro, Cheri J., Prinz, Ronald J., Sanders, Matthew R.·2012·Child Maltreatment
DOI 10.1177/1077559511424774
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The prevention of child maltreatment via parenting interventions requires implementation on a broad scale, which is facilitated by drawing on a multidisciplinary array of service workers located in multiple settings. This underscores the importance of understanding factors that impact worker implementation of evidenced-based parenting and family support interventions. This study involved structured interviews with 174 service providers from several disciplines who had been trained previously in the delivery of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. These follow-up interviews, conducted an average of about 2 years after professional in-service training, provided the basis for examining predictors of sustained program use. Predictors examined included facilitators and barriers to program use, as well as organizational and provider-level characteristics such as attitudes toward evidence-based interventions. Highlighting the importance of a systems–contextual perspective on implementation, several provider and organization-level characteristics significantly predicted program use including provider self-confidence after training, fit of program with ongoing duties, availability of posttraining support, and perceived benefit of intervention for children and families. Implications for prevention and implementation science are discussed in view of the challenges inherent in the field of child maltreatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077559511424774

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Determinants of practice can be identified through formal assessment processes, theory or conceptual models, research literature, or informal approaches such as brainstorming.

    “While these determinants of practice could be identified through formal assessment processes, they could also be identified using theory or conceptual models e.g., [87], research literature e.g., [59,60,88-90], or more informal approaches such as brainstorming e.g., [55].”

    From Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting (2013) · cites this paper as [90]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Shapiro, C. J., Prinz, R. J., & Sanders, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Cheri J.
ORCID
Venue
Child Maltreatment
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-11-16
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
86-95
ISSN
  • 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6119
DOI
10.1177/1077559511424774
OpenAlex
W2051806064
Cited by
131
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2014-11-24)
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R18CE001340)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U17/CCU422317)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
Keywords
child abuse prevention, parenting support, Triple P-Positive Parenting Program, implementation barriers and facilitators, service providers, family support interventions, organizational characteristics
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Parents, Referral and Consultation, Social Work, South Carolina, Program Development, Self Efficacy, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review