Cited by 103Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Sciences Research and Education

Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice in Mental Health Service Settings: An Overview of Developments in Implementation Theory and Research

Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey, Gutner, Cassidy A., Langdon, Kirsten, Graham, Jessica R.·2016·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Twenty years after Sobell's (1996) influential call to integrate advances in behavior therapy into clinical settings, significant progress has been made in implementation science. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of implementation research findings and highlight recent findings that can inform efforts to bridge the gap between research and practice in mental health service settings. Key findings are summarized, organized according to levels of influence described in two implementation frameworks: The Exploration, Planning, Implementation, and Sustainment Framework (EPIS; Aarons et al., 2011) and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR; Damschroder et al., 2009). Important levels of influence to consider when implementing new treatments include the outer context, inner context, characteristics of the individual, and characteristics of the innovation. Research on strategies to prepare clinicians to deliver evidence-based psychosocial treatments (EBPTs) and to address contextual barriers to implementation at each level is described, with discussion of implications for the implementation of EBPTs and next steps for research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2015.12.001

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stirman, S. W., Gutner, C. A., Langdon, K., & Graham, J. R.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Rhode Island Hospital (US)
  • Salem State University (US)
Corresponding author
Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
920-936
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2211497785
Cited by
103
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH103396)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
implementation research, implementation theory, research-practice gap, mental health services, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, EPIS framework, treatment implementation
MeSH terms
Humans, Mental Health Services, Psychotherapy, Evidence-Based Medicine, Information Dissemination, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review