Cited by 153Media Studies and CommunicationJournalism and Media StudiesMedia Influence and Politics

Effects of Editorial Media Bias Perception and Media Trust on the Use of Traditional, Citizen, and Social Media News

Ardèvol-Abreu, Alberto, Gil de Zúñiga, Homero·2017·Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly

Abstract

Citizens’ levels of mistrust toward the media, as well as their perception of media bias, have increased in past years in most Western democracies. This study explores how these negative observations on journalism may influence their use of traditional, citizen, and social media for news. Drawing on two-wave U.S. panel data, results suggest that media trust and perceived bias relate to media consumption differently. Trust in social and citizen media positively predicts use of news via social media, but has no effect on traditional or citizen news use. By contrast, perceived media bias is associated with decreased news use overall.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077699016654684

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trust in information on social media and trust in social media platforms both play a role in increasing people's use of social media.

    “The studies in our corpus show that trust in the information on social media [2,65], as well as trust in the social media platforms themselves [33,79], both play a role in increasing people's use of social media.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H.
Affiliations
University of Vienna, Austria
Venue
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Published
2016-06-27
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
703-724
ISSN
  • 1077-6990 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-430X
OpenAlex
W2474563622
Cited by
153
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
media bias perception, media trust, news consumption, social media news, citizen journalism, traditional news media, media distrust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review