The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x · Cited by 1,868
(2002) · Cited by 770
Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001 · Cited by 611
College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(03)00049-6 · Cited by 448
All the News That’s Fit to Fabricate: AI-Generated Text as a Tool of Media Misinformation
Kreps, S., McCain, R. M., & Brundage, M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2020.37 · Cited by 360
Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework
Rieh, S. Y., & Danielson, D. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114 · Cited by 336
Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability
Graefe, A., Haim, M., Haarmann, B., & Brosius, H.-B. (2018) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884916641269 · Cited by 315
Evaluating the Credibility of Online Information: A Test of Source and Advertising Influence
Greer, J. D. (2003) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0601_3 · Cited by 197
Edgerly, S., Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E., & Tham, S. M. (2020) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699019864680 · Cited by 145
Perceived Stakeholder Role Relationships and Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments 1
Arlikatti, S., Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2007) · International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters · doi:10.1177/028072700702500302 · Cited by 115
Smith, L. E., Potts, H. W., Amlȏt, R., Fear, N. T., Michie, S., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.09.15.20191957 · Cited by 296
Chang, C. (2015) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547015597914 · Cited by 94
Lan, D. H., & Tung, T. M. (2024) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2024.2302216 · Cited by 55
College students’ credibility judgments and heuristics concerning Wikipedia
Lim, S. (2013) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.004 · Cited by 48
Salaudeen, M. A., & Onyechi, N. (2020) · Cogent Arts & Humanities · doi:10.1080/23311983.2020.1837461 · Cited by 43
“Scholars agree that the above qualities are what the media—mainstream or digital—should possess as they are what the audience expect in every news and information (Appleman & Sundar, 2016; Gaziano & McGrath, 1986; Meyer, 1988).”
BackgroundNews use of mobile media: A contingency model
Thorson, E., Shoenberger, H., Karaliova, T., Kim, E. (., & Fidler, R. (2015) · Mobile Media & Communication · doi:10.1177/2050157914557692 · Cited by 38
Salaudeen, M. A. (2022) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2021.1892517 · Cited by 20
Measuring Source Credibility of Social Engineering Attackers on Facebook
Algarni, A., Xu, Y., & Chan, T. (2016) · 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.460 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, P.
- Venue
- Journalism Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 567-574
- ISSN
- 0196-3031 (ISSN-L)
- 0022-5533
- OpenAlex
- W2062117700
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.