Cited by 93Critical Race Theory in EducationCultural and political discourse analysisLatin American and Latino Studies

Visualizing Everyday Racism: Critical Race Theory, Visual Microaggressions, and the Historical Image of Mexican Banditry

Pérez Huber, Lindsay, Solorzano, Daniel G.·2015·Qualitative Inquiry

Abstract

Drawing from critical race and sociolinguistic discourse analysis, this article further develops the conceptual tool of racial microaggressions—the systemic, cumulative, everyday forms of racism experienced by People of Color—to articulate a type of racial microaggression, we call visual microaggressions. Visual microaggressions are systemic, everyday visual assaults based on race, gender, class, sexuality, language, immigration status, phenotype, accent, or surname that emerge in various mediums such as textbooks, children’s books, advertisements, film and television, dance and theater performance, and public signage and statuary. These microaggressions reinforce institutional racism and perpetuate ideologies of white supremacy. In this article, we use a racial microaggressions analytical framework to examine how the “Mexican bandit” visual microaggression has been utilized as a multimodal text that (re)produces racist discourses that in turn reinforce dominant power structures. These discourses have allowed for the Mexican bandit image to pervade the public imagination of Latinas/os for over 100 years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077800414562899

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pérez Huber, L., & Solorzano, D. G.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Long Beach, USA
  • University of California, Los Angeles, USA
Venue
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2015-02-25
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
223-238
ISSN
  • 1077-8004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7565
OpenAlex
W2001159280
Cited by
93
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
26.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Qualitative Inquiry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Latin American and Latino Studies
Keywords
racial microaggressions, racism, white supremacy, institutional racism, Latinas/os, multimodal discourse, stereotypes, public signage, children's literature, film and television representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review